SynthesisPediatric surgery international2024
Comparison for the diagnostic performance of early diagnostic methods for biliary atresia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The diagnostic accuracy of MMP-7 for the diagnosis for biliary atresia- a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- The diagnostic performance of ultrasound features for biliary atresia: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Pooled it
- Diagnostic and management guidelines for biliary atresia in 2025.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Review
- Comparative outcomes of open and laparoscopic Kasai portoenterostomy for biliary Atresia patients progressing to liver transplantation: A Real-World cohort study.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Diagnostic value of routine biochemical markers for biliary atresia in neonates with cholestasis: a retrospective study.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Early Prediction of Biliary Atresia Using Combi-Elastography in Infants ≤ 60 Days of Age.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparison of preoperative serum MMP-7 to liver two-dimensional shear wave elastography and its integration into a novel nomogram for predicting the native liver survival of infants with biliary atresia.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a screening model for early diagnosis of biliary atresia in neonates with cholestasis.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Article
- Clinical application of fly-thru in diagnosis of biliary obstructive diseases: feasibility, reproducibility, and diagnostic value.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- 25OH vitamin D3 in biliary atresia: a simple and under-utilised diagnostic method.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Biliary Atresia: advances and challenges in early diagnosis and management.Jornal de pediatriaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBiliary atresia (BA), a progressive condition affecting canalicular-bile duct function/anatomy, requires prompt surgical intervention for favorable outcomes. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis of common diagnostic methods to assess their performance and provide evidence-based support for clinical decision-making.
methodsWe reviewed literature in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane for BA diagnostics. The search included gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), direct/combined bilirubin, matrix metalloproteinase 7 (MMP-7), ultrasonic triangular cord sign (TCS), hepatic scintigraphy (HS), and percutaneous cholangiocholangiography/percutaneous transhepatic cholecysto-cholangiography (PCC/PTCC). QUADAS-2 assessed study quality. Heterogeneity and threshold effect were evaluated using I2 and Spearman's correlation. We combined effect estimates, constructed SROC models, and conducted a network meta-analysis based on the ANOVA model, along with meta-regression and subgroup analysis, to obtain precise diagnostic performance assessments for BA.
resultsA total of 40 studies were included in our analysis. GGT demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy for BA with a sensitivity of 81.5% (95% CI 0.792-0.836) and specificity of 72.1% (95% CI 0.693-0.748). Direct bilirubin/conjugated bilirubin showed a sensitivity of 87.6% (95% CI 0.833-0.911) but lower specificity of 59.4% (95% CI 0.549-0.638). MMP-7 exhibited a total sensitivity of 91.5% (95% CI 0.893-0.934) and a specificity of 84.3% (95% CI 0.820-0.863). TCS exhibited a sensitivity of 58.1% (95% CI 0.549-0.613) and high specificity of 92.9% (95% CI 0.911-0.944). HS had a high sensitivity of 98.4% (95% CI 0.968-0.994) and moderate specificity of 79.0% (95% CI 0.762-0.816). PCC/PTCC exhibited excellent diagnostic performance with a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 0.900-1.000) and specificity of 87.0% (95% CI 0.767-0.939). Based on the ANOVA model, the network meta-analysis revealed that MMP-7 ranked second overall, with PCC/PTCC ranking first, both exhibiting superior diagnostic accuracy compared to other techniques. Our analysis showed no significant bias in most methodologies, but MMP-7 and hepatobiliary scintigraphy exhibited biases, with p values of 0.023 and 0.002, respectively.
conclusionMMP-7 and ultrasound-guided PCC/PTCC show diagnostic potential in the early diagnosis of BA, but their clinical application is restricted due to practical limitations. Currently, the cutoff value of MMP-7 is unclear, and further evidence-based medical research is needed to firmly establish its diagnostic value. Until more evidence is available, MMP-7 is not suitable for widespread diagnostic use. Therefore, considering cost and operational simplicity, liver function tests combined with ultrasound remain the most clinically valuable non-invasive diagnostic methods for BA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38822892What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.