ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
Evaluation of treatment response by multiparametric MR imaging in locally advanced rectal tumors following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the effectiveness of multiparametric MRI examination in determining tumor response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced rectal tumors.
methods46 patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma were included and were divided into two groups as complete responders and nonresponders based on Mandard score. On MRI, relative T2w signal intensity and ADC values obtained before and after treatment and tumour volumes in dynamic contrast enhanced images (DCI) were used to determine complete response to treatment.
resultsThere were no significant differences between mean ADC values obtained by single slice ADC and three circular ROI methods. There were significant differences between two groups in terms of Post-CRT ADC value, ΔADC and %ΔADC obtained by whole tumour volume ADC method (p < 0.05). There were significant differences between Pre-CRT and Post-CRT volume values. ΔV DCI and %ΔV DCI, ΔV ADC and T2w volume values were significantly lower in complete responders (p < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, sensitivity and specificity were calculated as 88.9% and 91.9% (AUC = 0.943) when Post-CRT mean ADC value and Post-CRT DCI volume values were used together, and sensitivity and specificity were calculated as 88.9% and 94.6% (AUC = 0.949) when ΔADC and Post-CRT DCI volume values were used together.
conclusionWhole tumour volume mean ADC value is the most useful method to determine treatment response. Post-CRT DCI volume measurement stands out as the most useful method in assessing complete response alone. The highest diagnostic values are achieved when the post-CRT DCI volume is combined with the ADC change value of the whole tumor volume.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38822855What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.