Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38822460›Full record

ArticleJournal of water and health2024

Domestic access to water in a decentralized truck-to-cistern system: a case study in the Northern Village of Kangiqsualujjuaq, Nunavik (Canada).

Alexandra Cassivi, Anne Carabin, Caetano Dorea, Manuel J Rodriguez, Stéphanie Guilherme

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of water and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alexandra CassiviChaire de recherche CRSNG en eau potable, École supérieure d'aménagement du territoire et de développement régional, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada E-mail: alexandra.cassivi.1@ulaval.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8770-1296
Anne CarabinDepartment of Civil Engineering, Engineering and Computer Science (ECS), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6425-3734
Caetano DoreaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Engineering and Computer Science (ECS), University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9367-0668
Manuel J RodriguezChaire de recherche CRSNG en eau potable, École supérieure d'aménagement du territoire et de développement régional, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada.
Stéphanie GuilhermeDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaSentinelle Nord, Université Laval
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Municipal water supply through truck-to-cistern systems is common in northern Canada. Household satisfaction and concerns about water services likely impact user preferences and practices. This case study explores household perspectives and challenges with regard to domestic access to water in a decentralized truck-to-cistern system. A case study was conducted in the Northern Village of Kangiqsualujjuaq, Nunavik (Quebec, Canada). A paper-based questionnaire was completed by 65 households (one quarter of the population). Many households (37%) reported not drinking tap water from the truck-to-cistern system. Chlorine taste was a frequently reported concern, with those households being significantly less likely to drink water directly from the tap (

Indexed as

Drinking WaterWater SupplyAdultFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor VehiclesQuebecSurveys and QuestionnairesDrinking WaterArcticdomestic accessdrinking waterIndigenous peoplestruck-to-cistern

Identifiers

PMID38822460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.