Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38822355›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2024

ScAnalyzer: an image processing tool to monitor plant disease symptoms and pathogen spread in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves.

Misha Paauw, Gerrit Hardeman, Nanne W Taks, Lennart Lambalk, Jeroen A Berg, Sebastian Pfeilmeier, Harrold A van den Burg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Harnessing artificial intelligence in plant breeding: innovations in digital phenotyping and breeding methodologies.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Misha PaauwMolecular Plant Pathology, Faculty of Science, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences (SILS), University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, Amsterdam, 1098 XH, The Netherlands.
Gerrit HardemanTechnologie Centrum FNWI, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, Amsterdam, 1098 XH, The Netherlands.
Nanne W TaksMolecular Plant Pathology, Faculty of Science, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences (SILS), University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, Amsterdam, 1098 XH, The Netherlands.
Lennart LambalkMolecular Plant Pathology, Faculty of Science, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences (SILS), University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, Amsterdam, 1098 XH, The Netherlands.
Jeroen A BergMolecular Plant Pathology, Faculty of Science, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences (SILS), University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, Amsterdam, 1098 XH, The Netherlands.
Sebastian PfeilmeierMolecular Plant Pathology, Faculty of Science, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences (SILS), University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, Amsterdam, 1098 XH, The Netherlands.
Harrold A van den BurgMolecular Plant Pathology, Faculty of Science, Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences (SILS), University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, Amsterdam, 1098 XH, The Netherlands. H.A.vandenBurg@uva.nl.

Funding

Topsector T&U TU18024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlants are known to be infected by a wide range of pathogenic microbes. To study plant diseases caused by microbes, it is imperative to be able to monitor disease symptoms and microbial colonization in a quantitative and objective manner. In contrast to more traditional measures that use manual assignments of disease categories, image processing provides a more accurate and objective quantification of plant disease symptoms. Besides monitoring disease symptoms, computational image processing provides additional information on the spatial localization of pathogenic microbes in different plant tissues.

resultsHere we report on an image analysis tool called ScAnalyzer to monitor disease symptoms and bacterial spread in Arabidopsis thaliana leaves. Thereto, detached leaves are assembled in a grid and scanned, which enables automated separation of individual samples. A pixel color threshold is used to segment healthy (green) from chlorotic (yellow) leaf areas. The spread of luminescence-tagged bacteria is monitored via light-sensitive films, which are processed in a similar manner as the leaf scans. We show that this tool is able to capture previously identified differences in susceptibility of the model plant A. thaliana to the bacterial pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Moreover, we show that the ScAnalyzer pipeline provides a more detailed assessment of bacterial spread within plant leaves than previously used methods. Finally, by combining the disease symptom values with bacterial spread values from the same leaves, we show that bacterial spread precedes visual disease symptoms.

conclusionTaken together, we present an automated script to monitor plant disease symptoms and microbial spread in A. thaliana leaves. The freely available software ( https://github.com/MolPlantPathology/ScAnalyzer ) has the potential to standardize the analysis of disease assays between different groups.

Indexed as

Arabidopsis thalianaBioluminescenceBlack rot diseaseDigital phenotypingImage processingPlant diseaseXanthomonas campestris

Identifiers

PMID38822355
PMCPMC11141064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.