ArticleBMC health services research2024
Effects of a special continuous quality improvement in nursing on the management of adverse care events: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The dark side of nurse-manager leadership: toxic leadership behaviours, adverse-event reporting, and care quality-an interpretive descriptive study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- A retrospective descriptive study on the early identification of near-miss events in nursing.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Application of a Nursing Quality Improvement Checklist in the Emergency Treatment of Trauma Patients.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Network analysis of patient safety competency and patient safety culture among primary care nurses.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Reducing Nurses' Barriers to Reporting Adverse Events Using a WeChat-Based Cognitive Load Training Platform: An Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the application effect of the direct reporting system of adverse nursing events and special continuous nursing quality improvement measures in the management of these adverse events.
methodsThe implementation time of continuous nursing improvement based on the direct reporting system was the demarcation point. We retrospectively collected and analyzed nursing adverse event reports and hospitalization data from Xiangtan Central Hospital before implementation (2015-2018) and after implementation (2019-2022). The active reporting rate of adverse events, the composition of these events and the processing time were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe rate of active reporting of adverse events before the implementation was lower than that after the implementation (6.7% vs. 8.1%, X
conclusionThe direct reporting system of adverse nursing events and the continuous improvement measures for nursing quality can effectively improve the active reporting rate of adverse events, change their composition and reduce their processing time, as well as help create a safe psychological environment for both patients and nursing staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.