Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38822341›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Cashing in: cost-benefit analysis framework for digital hospitals.

Kim-Huong Nguyen, Tracy Comans, Thi Thao Nguyen, Digby Simpson, Leanna Woods, Chad Wright, Damian Green, Keith McNeil, Clair Sullivan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Appraising eHealth Investment for Africa: Scoping Review and Development of a Framework.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kim-Huong NguyenFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Tracy ComansFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Thi Thao NguyenFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. thao.nguyen@uq.edu.au.
Digby SimpsonFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Leanna WoodsFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Chad WrightFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Damian GreeneHealth Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Keith McNeilQueensland Department of Health, Brisbane, Australia.
Clair SullivanFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor many countries, especially those outside the USA without incentive payments, implementing and maintaining electronic medical records (EMR) is expensive and can be controversial given the large amounts of investment. Evaluating the value of EMR implementation is necessary to understand whether or not, such investment, especially when it comes from the public source, is an efficient allocation of healthcare resources. Nonetheless, most countries have struggled to measure the return on EMR investment due to the lack of appropriate evaluation frameworks.

methodsThis paper outlines the development of an evidence-based digital health cost-benefit analysis (eHealth-CBA) framework to calculate the total economic value of the EMR implementation over time. A net positive benefit indicates such investment represents improved efficiency, and a net negative is considered a wasteful use of public resources.

resultsWe developed a three-stage process that takes into account the complexity of the healthcare system and its stakeholders, the investment appraisal and evaluation practice, and the existing knowledge of EMR implementation. The three stages include (1) literature review, (2) stakeholder consultation, and (3) CBA framework development. The framework maps the impacts of the EMR to the quadruple aim of healthcare and clearly creates a method for value assessment.

conclusionsThe proposed framework is the first step toward developing a comprehensive evaluation framework for EMRs to inform health decision-makers about the economic value of digital investments rather than just the financial value.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisElectronic Health RecordsHumansCost benefit analysisDigital hospitalsEconomic evaluationElectronic medical recordsTotal economic value

Identifiers

PMID38822341
PMCPMC11143650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.