Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38822305›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2024

Double tract reconstruction improves the quality of life and better maintain the BMI of patients with proximal gastric cancer.

Zi Jian Wang, Zi Yao Xu, Zi Jie Huang, Li Li, Da Guan, Yun He Gao, Xin Xin Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Zi Jian Wang *Department of General Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zi Yao Xu *Department of General Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zi Jie Huang *Department of General Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Li LiDepartment of General Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Da GuanDepartment of General Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yun He GaoDepartment of General Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. yunhe_gao301@163.com.
Xin Xin WangDepartment of General Surgery, the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. 301wangxx@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to investigate the effect of double-tract reconstruction on short-term clinical outcome, quality of life and nutritional status of patients after proximal gastrectomy by comparing with esophagogastrostomy and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

methodsThe clinical data of patients who underwent double tract reconstruction (DTR), esophagogastrostomy (EG), total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (TG-RY) were retrospectively collected from May 2020 to May 2022. The clinical characteristics, short-term surgical outcomes, postoperative quality of life and nutritional status were compared among the three groups.

resultsCompared with the DTR group, the operation time in the TG group was significantly shorter (200(180,240) minutes vs. 230(210,255) minutes, p < 0.01), and more lymph nodes were removed (28(22, 25) vs. 22(19.31), p < 0.01), there were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, first flatus time, postoperative hospital stay and postoperative complication rate among the three groups. Postoperative digestive tract angiography was completed in 36 patients in the DTR group, of which 21 (58.3%) showed double-tract type of food passing. The incidence of postoperative reflux symptoms was 9.2% in the DTR group, 43.8% in the EG group and 23.2% in the TG group, repectively (P < 0.01). EORTCQLQ-STO22 questionnaire survey showed that compared with EG group, DTR group had fewer reflux symptoms (P < 0.05), fewer anxiety symptoms (P < 0.05) and more swallowing symptoms (P < 0.05). Compared with TG group, DTR group had fewer reflux symptoms (P < 0.05). There were no other significant differences between the two groups. Compared with TG group and EG group, DTR can better maintain postoperative BMI, and there is no statistical difference between the three groups in terms of hemoglobin and albumin.

conclusionsAlthough partial double-tract reconstruction approach does not always ensure food to enter the distal jejunum along the two pathways as expected, it still shows satisfactory anti-reflux effect. Moreover, it might improve patients' quality of life and maintain better nutritional status comparing with gastroesophageal anastomosis and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexGastrectomyQuality of LifeStomach NeoplasmsAgedAnastomosis, Roux-en-YFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritional StatusOperative TimePlastic Surgery ProceduresPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeDouble tract reconstructionGastric cancerProximal gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID38822305
PMCPMC11140886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.