Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38822295›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Relationships between oral function, dietary intake and nutritional status in older adults aged 75 years and above: a cross-sectional study.

Xiaoqing Wu, Yanqiu Xu, Yajun Liu, Aiguo Ma, Feng Zhong, Tianlin Gao, Jing Cai, Yong Chen, Yali Wang, Wenkai Zhou and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiaoqing WuDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Yanqiu XuDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Yajun LiuDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Aiguo MaInstitute of Nutrition and Health, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Feng ZhongDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Tianlin GaoDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Jing CaiInstitute of Nutrition and Health, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Yong ChenSchool of Food Science and Biotechnology, Food Oral Processing Laboratory, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yali WangDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Wenkai ZhouDepartment of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China.
Yan MaInstitute of Nutrition and Health, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong, China. mayanaa@qdu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMalnutrition is related to impaired oral health and function that causes poor dietary intake, declining the general health of older adults. The role of dietary intake in the association between oral function and nutritional status of Chinese older adults (aged 75 and above) was examined in this cross-sectional study.

methodsThrough the randomized cluster sampling method, 267 older adults living in rural areas of Qingdao, Shandong (aged 81.4 ± 4.3, 75-94 years) were chosen as the primary research participants. A Mini Nutritional Assessment - Short Form was used to determine nutritional status, and Food Frequency Questionnaire and 24-hour Food Intake Recall were used to assess dietary intake. The oral function was evaluated by analyzing the teeth, oral problems, bite force, tongue pressure, lip sealing pressure, chewing function questionnaire, whole saliva flow rate, 10-Item Eating Assessment Tool, and water swallow test.

resultsBased on the MNA-SF score, it was divided into a well-nourished group and a malnutrition group, with the malnutrition group comprising 40.6% of participants. The participants in the malnutrition group showed a higher rate of xerostomia, lower bite force, tongue pressure, and lip sealing pressure, and higher Chewing Function Questionnaire and 10-Item Eating Assessment Tool scores. Furthermore, their plant fat, iron, cereals and potatoes, vegetables, fruits, and seafood intake were relatively low. The regression model indicated that exercise frequency, stroke, chewing and swallowing function, intake of vegetables and fruits were risk factors for nutritional status of older adults.

conclusionMalnutrition was relatively common among the Chinese older adults aged 75 and above, and it was significantly correlated with exercise frequency, stroke, chewing and swallowing function, and intake of vegetables and fruits. Therefore, nutrition management should be carried out under the understanding and guidance of the oral function and dietary intake of the older adults.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusAgedAged, 80 and overChinaCross-Sectional StudiesDietEatingFemaleHumansMaleMalnutritionNutrition AssessmentOral HealthSurveys and QuestionnairesDietary intakeNutritional statusOlder adultsOral function

Identifiers

PMID38822295
PMCPMC11143706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.