Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38822262›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2024

Enhancing winter wheat prediction with genomics, phenomics and environmental data.

Osval A Montesinos-López, Andrew W Herr, José Crossa, Abelardo Montesinos-López, Arron H Carter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integration of crop modeling and sensing into molecular breeding for nutritional quality and stress tolerance.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  7. Improving plant breeding through AI-supported data integration.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Osval A Montesinos-LópezFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Colima, 28040, México.
Andrew W HerrDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
José CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera México- Veracruz, Edo. de México, CP 52640, México.
Abelardo Montesinos-LópezUniversidad de Guadalajara, Montecillos, Edo. de México, CP 56230, México.
Arron H CarterDepartment of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA. ahcarter@wsu.edu.

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2022-67013-36426USDA Hatch 1014919
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the realm of multi-environment prediction, when the goal is to predict a complete environment using the others as a training set, the efficiency of genomic selection (GS) falls short of expectations. Genotype by environment interaction poses a challenge in achieving high prediction accuracies. Consequently, current efforts are focused on enhancing efficiency by integrating various types of inputs, such as phenomics data, environmental information, and other omics data. In this study, we sought to evaluate the impact of incorporating environmental information into the modeling process, in addition to genomic and phenomics information. Our evaluation encompassed five data sets of soft white winter wheat, and the results revealed a significant improvement in prediction accuracy, as measured by the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE), through the integration of environmental information. Notably, there was an average gain in prediction accuracy of 49.19% in terms of NRMSE across the data sets. Moreover, the observed prediction accuracy ranged from 5.68% (data set 3) to 60.36% (data set 4), underscoring the substantial effect of integrating environmental information. By including genomic, phenomic, and environmental data in prediction models, plant breeding programs can improve selection efficiency across locations.

Indexed as

GenomicsPhenomicsTriticumEnvironmentGene-Environment InteractionGenome, PlantGenotypePhenotypePlant BreedingEnvironmental informationGenomic predictionGenomicsIntegrating additional inputsMulti-environment trailsPhenomics

Identifiers

PMID38822262
PMCPMC11143639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.