Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38822150›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2024

Application of the NSE score (Neurology-Stability-Epidural compression assessment) to establish the need for surgery in spinal metastases of elderly patients: a multicenter investigation.

Giuseppe Di Perna, Bianca Baldassarre, Daniele Armocida, Raffaele De Marco, Alessandro Pesaresi, Serena Badellino, Marco Bozzaro, Salvatore Petrone, Lucio Buffoni, Cristina Sonetto and 16 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Giuseppe Di PernaSpine Surgery Unit, Casa di Cura Città di Bra, Bra, Italy.
Bianca BaldassarreNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco, 15, Turin, 10126, Italy.
Daniele ArmocidaNeurosurgery Division, Università "La Sapienza" di Roma, Roma, Italy.
Raffaele De MarcoNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco, 15, Turin, 10126, Italy. raffaele.demarco@unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5187-4689
Alessandro PesaresiNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco, 15, Turin, 10126, Italy.
Serena BadellinoRadiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Marco BozzaroSpine Surgery Unit, Humanitas Gradenigo Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Salvatore PetroneSpine Surgery Unit, Humanitas Gradenigo Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Lucio BuffoniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Gradenigo Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Cristina SonettoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Gradenigo Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Emmanuele De LucaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Gradenigo Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Davide OttavianiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Gradenigo Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Fulvio TartaraNeurosurgery Unit, Istituto Clinico Città Studi, Milan, Italy.
Francesco ZengaNeurosurgery Unit, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Marco AjelloNeurosurgery Unit, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Nicola MarengoNeurosurgery Unit, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" University Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Michele LanotteNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco, 15, Turin, 10126, Italy.
Roberto AltieriDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G.Rodolico-S.Marco" University Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Francesco CertoDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G.Rodolico-S.Marco" University Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Alessandro PesceNeurosurgery Division, A.O. "Santa Maria Goretti", Latina, Italy.
Angelo PompucciNeurosurgery Division, A.O. "Santa Maria Goretti", Latina, Italy.
Alessandro FratiNeurosurgery, IRCCS-"Neuromed", Pozzilli, Italy.
Umberto RicardiRadiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Giuseppe Maria BarbagalloDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Policlinico "G.Rodolico-S.Marco" University Hospital, Catania, Italy.
Diego GarbossaNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco, 15, Turin, 10126, Italy.
Fabio CofanoNeurosurgery Unit, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Via Cherasco, 15, Turin, 10126, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis retropective multicentric study aims to investigate the clinical applicability of the NSE score in the elderly, to verify the role of this tool as an easy help for decision making also for this class of patients.

methodsAll elderly patients (> 65 years) suffering from spinal metastases undergoing surgical or non-surgical treatment at the authors' Institutions between 2015 and 2022 were recruited. An agreement group (AG) and non-agreement group (NAG) were identified accordingly to the agreement between the NSE score indication and the performed treatment. Neurological status and axial pain were evaluated for both groups at follow-up (3 and 6 months). The same analysis was conducted specifically grouping patients older than 75 years.

resultsA strong association with improvement or preservation of clinical status (p < 0.001) at follow-up was obtained in AG. The association was not statistically significant in NAG at the 3-month follow-up (p 1.00 and 0.07 respectively) and at 6 months (p 0.293 and 0.09 respectively). The group of patients over 75 years old showed similar results in terms of statistical association between the agreement group and better outcomes.

conclusionFar from the need or the aim to build dogmatic algorithms, the goal of preserving a proper performance status plays a key role in a modern oncological management: functional outcomes of the multicentric study group showed that the NSE score represents a reliable tool to establish the need for surgery also for elderly patients.

Indexed as

Spinal NeoplasmsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSpinal Cord CompressionEpidural compressionNSE scoreSeparation surgerySpinal instabilitySpinal metastases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.