ArticleScientific reports2024
Design of osteosynthesis plate for detecting bone union using wire natural frequency.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- New design of plate implant for bone healing assessment using frequency measurement: a biomechanical cadaveric study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We have developed a novel osteosynthesis plate with bone union detection using a wire's natural frequency (BUDWF) to provide the quantitative result of bone union detection. The concept for detecting bone union is measuring the rate of frequency change. The frequency is measured from sound generated from the wire attached to a modified plate. The plate is modified from a Syncera ADLER B0409.10 and attached with 0.3 mm diameter 316L stainless steel wire. The sound generation mechanism was created by PEEK and installed on the plate to generate the sound. The preliminary experiments were conducted on a Sawbones tibia composite mimic. We used the cut Sawbones to create fracture samples with a 0, 0.5, 1-, 2-, and 5-mm gap representing the fractured bone with different gap sizes and prepared uncut Sawbones as a union sample. These samples were tested five times, and the sound was recorded from a condenser microphone and analyzed. We found that the BUDWF can differentiate samples with a fracture gap above 2 mm from the union sample, as the differences in the rates of frequency change between samples with a fracture gap above 2 mm and union samples were statistically significant. However, there was a limitation that the BUDWF plate was still unable to differentiate the 0 mm fracture gap and the union sample in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.