ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2024
The impact of hypovolemia and PEEP on recirculation in venovenous ECMO: an experimental porcine model.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cannula tip separation and configuration as determinants of recirculation in venovenous ECMO.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2026Article
- Accelerometer-based vibration analysis and oxygenator thrombosis in venovenous ECMO: an experimental porcine model.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecirculation is a common problem in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) and may limit the effect of ECMO treatment due to less efficient blood oxygenation or unfavorable ECMO and ventilator settings. The impact of hypovolemia and positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) on recirculation is unclear and poorly described in guidelines, despite clinical importance. The aim of this study was to investigate how hypovolemia, autotransfusion and PEEP affect recirculation in comparison to ECMO cannula distance and circuit flow.
methodsIn anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs (n = 6) on VV ECMO, we measured recirculation fraction (RF), changes in recirculation fraction (∆RF), hemodynamics and ECMO circuit pressures during alterations in PEEP (5 cmH
resultsRecirculation increased during hypovolemia (median ∆RF 43%), high PEEP (∆RF 28% and 12% with long and short cannula distance, respectively), high ECMO flow (∆RF 49% and 28% with long and short cannula distance, respectively) and with short cannula distance (∆RF 16%). Recirculation decreased after autotransfusion (∆RF - 45%).
conclusionsIn the present animal study, hypovolemia, PEEP and autotransfusion were important determinants of recirculation. The alterations were comparable to other well-known factors, such as ECMO circuit flow and intravascular cannula distance. Interestingly, hypovolemia increased recirculation without significant change in ECMO drainage pressure, whereas high PEEP increased recirculation with less negative ECMO drainage pressure. Autotransfusion decreased recirculation. The findings are interesting for clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.