Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38822042›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2024

Physiological mechanisms behind respiratory variations in right atrial pressure in pulmonary hypertension.

Athiththan Yogeswaran, Bruno Brito da Rocha, Zvonimir A Rako, Samuel J Kaufmann, Simon Schäfer, Nils Kremer, Hossein Ardeschir Ghofrani, Werner Seeger, Khodr Tello

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04663217 (Exercise Hemodynamic, Right Ventricular Coupling and Echocardiography in Pulmonary Hypertension), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04663217 completednot on this map

Exercise Hemodynamic, Right Ventricular Coupling and Echocardiography in Pulmonary Hypertension

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity of GiessenRan2020 to 2023Enrolled120ConditionsHypertension, Pulmonary, Hypertension, Pulmonary ArterialArmsExercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Athiththan YogeswaranDepartment of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.
Bruno Brito da RochaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.
Zvonimir A RakoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.
Samuel J KaufmannDepartment of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.
Simon SchäferDepartment of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.
Nils KremerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.
Hossein Ardeschir GhofraniDepartment of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.
Werner SeegerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany.
Khodr TelloDepartment of Internal Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Institute for Lung Health (ILH), Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (CPI), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Giessen, Germany. Khodr.Tello@innere.med.uni-giessen.de.

Funding

Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 1213 - Pulmonary Hypertension and Cor Pulmonale SFB1213/1, project B08 (German Research Foundation, Bonn, Germany)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impaired respiratory variation of right atrial pressure (RAP) in severe pulmonary hypertension (PH) suggests difficulty tolerating increased preload during inspiration. Our study explores whether this impairment links to specific factors: right ventricular (RV) diastolic function, elevated RV afterload, systolic RV function, or RV-pulmonary arterial (PA) coupling. We retrospectively evaluated respiratory RAP variation in all participants enrolled in the EXERTION study. Impaired respiratory variation was defined as end-expiratory RAP - end-inspiratory RAP ≤ 2 mm Hg. RV function and afterload were evaluated using conductance catheterization. Impaired diastolic RV function was defined as end-diastolic elastance (Eed) ≥ median (0.19 mm Hg/mL). Seventy-five patients were included; PH was diagnosed in 57 patients and invasively excluded in 18 patients. Of the 75 patients, 31 (41%) had impaired RAP variation, which was linked with impaired RV systolic function and RV-PA coupling and increased tricuspid regurgitation and Eed as compared to patients with preserved RAP variation. In backward regression, RAP variation associated only with Eed. RAP variation but not simple RAP identified impaired diastolic RV function (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [95% confidence interval]: 0.712 [0.592, 0.832] and 0.496 [0.358, 0.634], respectively). During exercise, patients with impaired RAP variation experienced greater RV dilatation and reduced diastolic reserve and cardiac output/index compared with patients with preserved RAP variation. Preserved RAP variation was associated with a better prognosis than impaired RAP variation based on the 2022 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society risk score (chi-square P = 0.025) and survival free from clinical worsening (91% vs 71% at 1 year and 79% vs 50% at 2 years [log-rank P = 0.020]; hazard ratio: 0.397 [95% confidence interval: 0.178, 0.884]). Subgroup analyses in patients with group 1 and group 4 PH demonstrated consistent findings with those observed in the overall study cohort. Respiratory RAP variations reflect RV diastolic function, are independent of RV-PA coupling or tricuspid regurgitation, are associated with exercise-induced haemodynamic changes, and are prognostic in PH.Trial registration. NCT04663217.

Indexed as

Atrial PressureHypertension, PulmonaryAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesVentricular Function, RightConductance catheterizationDiastolic dysfunctionEnd-diastolic elastanceExercise haemodynamicsPrognosisPulmonary hypertensionRespiratory variationRetrospective analysisRight atrial pressureRight ventricular dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID38822042
PMCPMC11143365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.