Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38821914›Full record

ArticleBlood cancer journal2024

Impact of Extraosseous Extramedullary Disease on Outcomes of Patients with Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma receiving Standard-of-Care Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy.

Danai Dima, Al-Ola Abdallah, James A Davis, Hussein Awada, Utkarsh Goel, Aliya Rashid, Shaun DeJarnette, Faiz Anwer, Leyla Shune, Shahzad Raza and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Blood cancer journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Danai Dima *Department of Hematology/Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA. dimad@ccf.org.ORCID 0000-0002-3587-7975
Al-Ola Abdallah *US Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Westwood, KS, USA.
James A DavisUS Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Westwood, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7978-1652
Hussein AwadaDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1445-7947
Utkarsh GoelDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Aliya RashidUS Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Westwood, KS, USA.
Shaun DeJarnetteUS Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Westwood, KS, USA.
Faiz AnwerDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6914-7439
Leyla ShuneUS Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Westwood, KS, USA.
Shahzad RazaDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2739-2265
Zahra MahmoudjafariUS Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Westwood, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3168-2521
Louis WilliamsDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Beth FaimanDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Joseph P McGuirkUS Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Westwood, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0539-4796
Craig S SauterDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Nausheen AhmedUS Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Westwood, KS, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4336-4982
Jack KhouriDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Hamza HashmiUS Myeloma Innovations Research Collaborative (USMIRC), Westwood, KS, USA. hamzahashmi87@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4129-5867

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of extramedullary disease (EMD) has been associated with poor outcomes in patients with relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Herein, we report the outcomes of RRMM patients who were treated with standard-of-care (SOC) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy and had active extraosseous EMD before the infusion. Data were retrospectively collected from patients at three US institutions with the intent to receive SOC CAR T. Responses were assessed per the International Myeloma Working Group criteria. A total of 152 patients proceeded with infusion, of whom 47 (31%) had EMD (EMD group) and 105 (69%) did not (non-EMD group). Baseline patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups. The EMD group had a higher incidence of high-grade CRS, steroid and anakinra use, and thrombocytopenia on day +30 compared to the non-EMD group. In addition, the EMD group had an inferior overall response rate (58% vs 96%, p < 0.00001), median progression-free survival (PFS) (5.1 vs 12.4 months; p < 0.0001), and overall survival (OS) (12.2 vs 27.5 months; p = 0.00058) compared to the non-EMD group. We further subdivided the non-EMD patients into those with paramedullary disease (PMD-only group, n = 26 [17%]) and those with neither EMD nor PMD (bone marrow-contained group or BM-only group, n = 79 [52%]). Patients with PMD-only had similar median PFS (11.2 vs 13.6 months, p = 0.3798) and OS (not reached [NR] vs 27.5 months, p = 0.6446) compared to patients with BM-only disease. However, patients with EMD exhibited inferior median PFS (5.1 vs 13.6 months, p < 0.0001) and OS (12.2 vs 27.5, p = 0.0008) compared to patients in the BM-only group. Treatment with SOC CAR T yielded meaningful clinical outcomes in real-world RRMM patients with extraosseous EMD, though responses and survival outcomes were suboptimal compared to patients without EMD. The presence of only EMD but not PMD was associated with significantly worse survival outcomes following the CAR T infusion.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveMultiple MyelomaAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReceptors, Chimeric AntigenRetrospective StudiesStandard of CareTreatment OutcomeReceptors, Chimeric Antigen

Identifiers

PMID38821914
PMCPMC11143360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.