ArticleBMJ open2024
Appropriate use of blood cultures in the emergency department through machine learning (ABC): study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06163781 (Appropriate Use of Blood Cultures in the Emergency Department Through Machine Learning), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Appropriate Use of Blood Cultures in the Emergency Department Through Machine Learning: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bacteremia Identified After Emergency Department Discharge in Adults: A Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes and Risk Factors.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A retrospective analysis of emergency department cultures in a tertiary care center.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Evaluation of machine learning pipeline for blood culture outcome prediction on prospectively collected emergency department data.Journal of medical microbiology · 2026Article
- How can non-inferiority studies with mortality end points be ethically justified?Journal of medical ethics · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for sepsis management in the emergency department.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Review
- A protocol for retrospective evaluation of potential patient-level harms of an AI tool for blood culture stewardship.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
- A Case Report in Using a Laboratory-Based Decision Support Alert for Research Enrollment and Randomization.Applied clinical informatics · 2025Article
- Letter to the Editor regarding "blood culture bottle shortage mitigation efforts: analysis of impact on ordering and patient impact" by Doern et al.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe liberal use of blood cultures in emergency departments (EDs) leads to low yields and high numbers of false-positive results. False-positive, contaminated cultures are associated with prolonged hospital stays, increased antibiotic usage and even higher hospital mortality rates. This trial aims to investigate whether a recently developed and validated machine learning model for predicting blood culture outcomes can safely and effectively guide clinicians in withholding unnecessary blood culture analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing current practice with a machine learning-guided approach. The primary objective is to determine whether the machine learning based approach is non-inferior to standard practice based on 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes include hospital length-of stay and hospital admission rates. Other outcomes include model performance and antibiotic usage. Participants will be recruited in the EDs of multiple hospitals in the Netherlands. A total of 7584 participants will be included. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Possible participants will receive verbal information and a paper information brochure regarding the trial. They will be given at least 1 hour consideration time before providing informed consent. Research results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. This study has been approved by the Amsterdam University Medical Centers' local medical ethics review committee (No 22.0567). The study will be conducted in concordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act, General Data Privacy Regulation and Medical Device Regulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06163781.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.