Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38821558›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

Global health reciprocal innovation: ethical, legal and regulatory considerations.

Annette Rid, Bernardo Aguilera, Chikosa Banda, Rao Divi, Matthew Harris, Amanda Kim, Miguel Ossandon, John Zervos, Virginia Rowthorn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Annette RidDepartment of Bioethics, The Clinical Center & Department of International Science Policy, Planning and Evaluation, Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA annette.rid@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1117-1975
Bernardo AguileraFaculty of Medicine and Science, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9138-5003
Chikosa BandaSchool of Law, University of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi.
Rao DiviMethods and Technologies Branch, Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Matthew HarrisDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0005-9710
Amanda KimSchool of Nursing, University of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Miguel OssandonCancer Diagnosis Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
John ZervosThe Global Health Initiative, Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Virginia RowthornGraduate School, Umiversity of Maryland Baltimore, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global health reciprocal innovation (GHRI) is a recent and more formalised approach to conducting research that recognises and develops innovations (eg, medicines, devices, methodologies) from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). At present, studies using GHRI most commonly adapt innovations from LMICs for use in high-income countries (HICs), although some develop innovations in LMICs and HICs. In this paper, we propose that GHRI implicitly makes two ethical commitments: (1) to promote health innovations from LMICs, especially in HICs, and (2) to conduct studies on health innovations from LMICs in equitable partnerships between investigators in LMICs and HICs. We argue that these commitments take a significant step towards a more equal global health research enterprise while helping to ensure that populations and investigators in LMICs receive equitable benefits from studies using GHRI. However, studies using GHRI can raise potential ethical concerns and face legal and regulatory barriers. We propose ethical, legal and regulatory considerations to help address these concerns and barriers. We hope our recommendations will allow GHRI to move the global health research enterprise forward into an era where all people are treated equally as knowers and learners, while populations in both LMICs and HICs benefit equitably from studies using GHRI.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesGlobal HealthBiomedical ResearchDiffusion of InnovationHumansInternational CooperationGlobal HealthHealth policyHealth services researchPublic Health

Identifiers

PMID38821558
PMCPMC11144796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.