Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38820870›Full record

ArticleTicks and tick-borne diseases2024

Geographic variation in the distribution of Anaplasma phagocytophilum variants in host-seeking Ixodes scapularis nymphs and adults in the eastern United States elucidated using next generation sequencing.

Andrias Hojgaard, Erik Foster, Sarah E Maes, Lynn M Osikowicz, Christina M Parise, Joel Villalpando, Rebecca J Eisen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ticks and tick-borne diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrias HojgaardDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA. Electronic address: fth3@cdc.gov.
Erik FosterDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Sarah E MaesDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Lynn M OsikowiczDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Christina M PariseDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Joel VillalpandoDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Rebecca J EisenDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human anaplasmosis cases, caused by Anaplasma phagocytophilum, are increasing in the United States. This trend is explained, in part, by expansion in the geographic range of the primary vector, Ixodes scapularis. Multiple variants of A. phagocytophilum have been identified in field collected ticks, but only a single variant (human active, or "Ap-ha," variant) has been shown to be pathogenic in humans. Until recently, laboratory methods used to differentiate variants were cumbersome and seldomly used in large scale assessments of the pathogen's geographic distribution. As a result, many surveys reported A. phagocytophilum without segregating variants. Lack of discrimination among A. phagocytophilum variants could lead to overestimation of anaplasmosis risk to humans. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) assays were recently developed to efficiently detect multiple Ixodes scapularis-borne human pathogens including Ap-ha. In this study, we utilized NGS to detect and differentiate A. phagocytophilum variants (Ap-ha vs. non ha) in host-seeking I. scapularis nymphs and adults collected across 23 states in the eastern United States from 2012 to 2023 as part of national tick surveillance efforts and research studies. Many of the included ticks were tested previously using a TaqMan PCR assay that could detect A. phagocytophilum but could not differentiate variants. We retested A. phagocytophilum infected ticks with NGS to differentiate variants. Anaplasma phagocytophilum (any variant) was identified in 165 (35 %) of 471 counties from which ticks were tested, whereas Ap-ha was detected in 70 (15 %) of 469 counties where variants were differentiated. Both variants were identified in 32 % (n = 40) of 126 counties with either variant detected. Among states where A. phagocytophilum (any variant) was detected, prevalence ranged from 2 % to 19 % in unfed adults and from 0.2 % to 7.8 % in unfed nymphs; prevalence of Ap-ha variant ranged from 0.0 % to 16 % in adults, and 0.0 % to 4.6 % in nymphs.

Indexed as

Anaplasma phagocytophilumHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingIxodesNymphAnimalsEhrlichiosisFemaleUnited StatesAnaplasma phagocytophilumDeer ticksTick-borne diseasesTick surveillance

Identifiers

PMID38820870
PMCPMC11774202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.