SynthesisEuropean endodontic journal2025
Increased Prevalence of Periapical Lesions in Osteoporosis Patients: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in European endodontic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals PACS1 as a Potential Shared Candidate Biomarker for Apical Periodontitis and Osteoporosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Periapical lesion healing in osteoporosis patients: an explorative retrospective, controlled pilot cohort study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Endodontic treatment and management of patients under antiresorptive treatment: a scoping review on MRONJ risk.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Effects of ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis and two photobiomodulation protocols on the repair of apical periodontitis in Wistar rats: A microCT study.International endodontic journal · 2025Article
- Association of Osteoporosis with Tooth Loss and Dental Radiomorphometric Indices.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Assessment of the occurrence of apical periodontitis and endodontically treated/non-treated teeth in a Lower Austrian patient population treated for osteoporosis: a cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing scientific literature about prevalence of periapical lesions in individuals with osteoporosis in comparison to those without osteoporosis. Systematic searches were conducted up to November 24th, 2023 in Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Grey Literature Reports databases. Only observational studies were included. The ROBINS-E tool, a revised Cochrane instrument for assessing bias in nonrandomized exposure studies, was employed. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool was utilized to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. From 484 studies, three were included. One of them was categorized as having an exceptionally high risk of bias, while two were deemed to have certain concerns. Two studies reported that osteoporotic patients may have more chances to present a periapical lesion compared to non-osteoporotic patients. One study reported no differences between groups. The GRADE analysis indicated a markedly low level of certainty in the evidence. The present review indicates that osteoporotic patients may present more periapical lesions compared to non-osteoporotic patients. This statement should be cautiously interpreted and further well-designed studies are needed. (EEJ-2023-09-123).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.