ArticleBlood advances2024
Safety and efficacy of luspatercept for the treatment of anemia in patients with myelofibrosis.
Article in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03194542 (A Phase-2 Study To Determine Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept in Subjects With Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Associated Myelofibrosis and Anemia With or Without Red Blood Cell-Transfusion Dependence), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase-2 Study To Determine Efficacy and Safety of Luspatercept in Subjects With Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Associated Myelofibrosis and Anemia With or Without Red Blood Cell-Transfusion Dependence
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inhibition of RhoA-mediated secretory autophagy in megakaryocytes mitigates myelofibrosis in mice.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Selinexor for myelofibrosis or a drug in search of a disease?Blood cancer journal · 2026Article
- The inflammatory/fibrotic axis across organs: myelofibrosis as a model of reversibility.JCI insight · 2026Review
- Navigating Anemia in Solid and Hematologic Malignancies: A Comprehensive Review of Classical and Emerging Therapies.European journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Prospects of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy in Myelofibrosis: From Immunopathogenesis to Therapeutic Strategies.Cancers · 2026Review
- Sex and gender differences in responses to antianemic therapies: biological mechanisms and clinical implications.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Review
- JAK inhibitor selection in challenging scenarios of myelofibrosis: a review.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Sotatercept for the Treatment of Myeloproliferative Neoplasm-Associated Group 5 Pulmonary Hypertension.JACC. CardioOncology · 2026Article
- Luspatercept: From Bench to Bedside and Beyond in the Management of Ineffective Erythropoiesis.Journal of hematology · 2026Review
- Integrated transcriptome-proteome analysis in patients with myelofibrosis-related anemia.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Overexpression of the TGF-β target CCN2 in megakaryocytes: a common feature of MDS with mutated SF3B1 : Uncovering novelinsights into the bone marrow microenvironment in MDS.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Article
- Management of splenomegaly in patients with myelofibrosis in the era of JAK inhibitors: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Cytokine Landscapes, Immune Dysregulation, and Treatment Perspectives in Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Myelofibrosis: Treatment Options After Ruxolitinib Failure.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Momelotinib in JAK2 inhibitor-naïve myelofibrosis: pros and cons.Blood cancer journal · 2025Article
- Emerging Therapeutic Approaches for Anemia in Myelofibrosis.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2025Review
- Fedratinib in 2025 and beyond: indications and future applications.Blood advances · 2025Review
- Managing Myelofibrosis: Matching Advances in Treatments With Clinical Unmet Needs.Hematological oncology · 2025Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractThe ACE-536-MF-001 trial enrolled patients with myelofibrosis (n = 95) into 4 cohorts: patients in cohorts 1 and 3A were non-transfusion dependent (NTD) and had anemia; patients in cohorts 2 and 3B were transfusion dependent (TD); and patients in cohort 3A/3B had stable ruxolitinib treatment before and during the study. All patients received luspatercept (1.0-1.75 mg/kg, 21-day cycles). Treatment was extended if clinical benefit was observed at day 169. The primary end point was anemia response rate (NTD, ≥1.5 g/dL hemoglobin increase from baseline; TD, transfusion-independence) over any 12-week period during the primary treatment period (weeks 1-24). Overall, 14% of patients in cohorts 1 and 3A, 10% in cohort 2, and 26% in cohort 3B met the primary end point. In cohorts 1 and 3A (NTD), 27% and 50% of patients, respectively, had mean hemoglobin increase of ≥1.5 g/dL from baseline. Among TD patients, ∼50% had ≥50% reduction in transfusion burden. Reduction in total symptom score was observed in all cohorts, with the greatest response rate seen in cohort 3A. Overall, 94% of patients had ≥1 adverse event (AE); 47% had ≥1 treatment-related AE (TRAE; 11% grade ≥3), most frequently hypertension (18%), managed with medical intervention. One patient had a serious TRAE leading to luspatercept discontinuation. Nine patients died on treatment (unrelated to study drug). In most patients, ruxolitinib dose and spleen size remained stable. In patients with myelofibrosis, luspatercept improved anemia and transfusion burden across cohorts; the safety profile was consistent with previous studies. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03194542.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.