Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38820401›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

A model for skin cancer using combination of ensemble learning and deep learning.

Mehdi Hosseinzadeh, Dildar Hussain, Firas Muhammad Zeki Mahmood, Farhan A Alenizi, Amirhossein Noroozi Varzeghani, Parvaneh Asghari, Aso Darwesh, Mazhar Hussain Malik, Sang-Woong Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mehdi HosseinzadehInstitute of Research and Development, Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam.
Dildar HussainDepartment of AI and Data Science, Sejong University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-9007-6284
Firas Muhammad Zeki MahmoodDepartment of Communication and Computer Engineering, Cihan University-Erbil, Kurdistan Region, Iraq.
Farhan A AleniziElectrical Engineering Department, College of engineering, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Amirhossein Noroozi VarzeghaniDepartment of Computer Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Parvaneh AsghariDepartment of Computer Engineering, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Aso DarweshDepartment of Information Technology, University of Human Development, Sulaymaniyah, Kurdistan region of Iraq.
Mazhar Hussain MalikSchool of Computer Science and Creative Technologies College of Arts, Technology and Environment (CATE) University of the West of England Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8890-1310
Sang-Woong LeePattern Recognition and Machine Learning Lab, Gachon University, Seongnamdaero, Sujeonggu, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin cancer has a significant impact on the lives of many individuals annually and is recognized as the most prevalent type of cancer. In the United States, an estimated annual incidence of approximately 3.5 million people receiving a diagnosis of skin cancer underscores its widespread prevalence. Furthermore, the prognosis for individuals afflicted with advancing stages of skin cancer experiences a substantial decline in survival rates. This paper is dedicated to aiding healthcare experts in distinguishing between benign and malignant skin cancer cases by employing a range of machine learning and deep learning techniques and different feature extractors and feature selectors to enhance the evaluation metrics. In this paper, different transfer learning models are employed as feature extractors, and to enhance the evaluation metrics, a feature selection layer is designed, which includes diverse techniques such as Univariate, Mutual Information, ANOVA, PCA, XGB, Lasso, Random Forest, and Variance. Among transfer models, DenseNet-201 was selected as the primary feature extractor to identify features from data. Subsequently, the Lasso method was applied for feature selection, utilizing diverse machine learning approaches such as MLP, XGB, RF, and NB. To optimize accuracy and precision, ensemble methods were employed to identify and enhance the best-performing models. The study provides accuracy and sensitivity rates of 87.72% and 92.15%, respectively.

Indexed as

Deep LearningSkin NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID38820401
PMCPMC11142560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.