Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38820396›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

MAD-FC: A fold change visualization with readability, proportionality, and symmetry.

Bruce A Corliss, Yaotian Wang, Francis P Driscoll, Heman Shakeri, Philip E Bourne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bruce A CorlissSchool of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2962-7344
Yaotian WangDepartment of Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Francis P DriscollSchool of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
Heman ShakeriSchool of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
Philip E BourneSchool of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We propose a fold change transform that demonstrates a combination of visualization properties exhibited by log and linear plots of fold change. A fold change visualization should ideally exhibit: (1) readability, where fold change values are recoverable from datapoint position; (2) proportionality, where fold change values of the same direction are proportionally distant from the point of no change; (3) symmetry, where positive and negative fold changes of the same magnitude are equidistant to the point of no change; and (4) high dynamic range, where datapoint values are distinguishable across orders of magnitude within a fixed plot area and pixel resolution. A linear visualization has readability and partial proportionality but lacks high dynamic range and symmetry (because negative direction fold changes are bound between [0, 1] while positive are between (1, ∞)). Log plots of fold change have partial readability, high dynamic range, and symmetry, but lack proportionality because of the log transform. We outline a new transform, named mirrored axis distortion of fold change (MAD-FC), that extends a linear visualization of fold change data to exhibit readability, proportionality, and symmetry (but still has the limited dynamic range of linear plots). We illustrate the use of MAD-FC with biomedical data using various fold change plots. We argue that MAD plots may be a more useful visualization than log or linear plots for applications that do not require a high dynamic range (less than 8 units in log2 space).

Identifiers

PMID38820396
PMCPMC11142613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.