Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38820371›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Improved methodology for fixation and preparation of Aedes aegypti embryos.

William Reid, Geyenna Sterling-Lentsch, Marc S Halfon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William ReidDepartment of Biochemistry, University at Buffalo-State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.
Geyenna Sterling-LentschDepartment of Biochemistry, University at Buffalo-State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.
Marc S HalfonDepartment of Biochemistry, University at Buffalo-State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4149-2705

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti is a major disease vector and an increasingly popular emerging model research organism. We present here an improved protocol for the collection, fixation, and preparation of A. aegypti embryos for immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization studies. The processing of A. aegypti embryos for such studies is complicated by the inability to easily remove the vitelline membrane, which prevents the reagents needed for staining from reaching their targets, and which furthermore obscures visualization of the embryo since the membrane is highly sclerotized. Previously described protocols for removal of the vitelline membrane are very low throughput, limiting the capacity of work that can be accomplished in a reasonable timeframe. Our adapted protocol increases the throughput capacity of embryos by an individual user, with experienced users able to prepare an average of 100-150 embryos per hour. The protocol provides high-quality intact embryos that can be used for morphological, immunohistochemical, and in situ hybridization studies. The protocol has been successfully tested on embryos of ages ranging from 14h after egg laying (AEL) at 27°C through to 55h AEL. Critical to the success of the optimized protocol is the selection, fabrication, and description of the tools required. To this end, a video-demonstrated protocol has been placed at protocols.io to clarify the protocol and provide easy access and training to anyone interested in the preparation of A. aegypti embryos for biological studies.

Indexed as

AedesIn Situ HybridizationAnimalsEmbryo, NonmammalianFemaleImmunohistochemistryTissue Fixation

Identifiers

PMID38820371
PMCPMC11142583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.