Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38820337›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Multimodal MALDI imaging mass spectrometry for improved diagnosis of melanoma.

Wanqiu Zhang, Nathan Heath Patterson, Nico Verbeeck, Jessica L Moore, Alice Ly, Richard M Caprioli, Bart De Moor, Jeremy L Norris, Marc Claesen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. MALDI spatial proteomics: a mini review of approaches and techniques.Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications · 2026
    Review
  3. Topological segmentation of mass spectrometry imaging data.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Wanqiu ZhangSTADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing, and Data Analytics, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1624-3421
Nathan Heath PattersonFrontier Diagnostics, LLC, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Nico VerbeeckAspect Analytics NV, Genk, Belgium.
Jessica L MooreFrontier Diagnostics, LLC, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Alice LyAspect Analytics NV, Genk, Belgium.
Richard M CaprioliFrontier Diagnostics, LLC, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Bart De MoorSTADIUS Center for Dynamical Systems, Signal Processing, and Data Analytics, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Jeremy L NorrisFrontier Diagnostics, LLC, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Marc ClaesenAspect Analytics NV, Genk, Belgium.

Funding

A Molecular Diagnostic Assay for Accurately Differentiating Melanoma from Benign LesionsR44CA228897 · NCI · FRONTIER DIAGNOSTICS, LLC · PI HACHEY, DAVID L · 2018 to 2020
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R44 CA228897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) provides promising avenues to augment histopathological investigation with rich spatio-molecular information. We have previously developed a classification model to differentiate melanoma from nevi lesions based on IMS protein data, a task that is challenging solely by histopathologic evaluation. Most IMS-focused studies collect microscopy in tandem with IMS data, but this microscopy data is generally omitted in downstream data analysis. Microscopy, nevertheless, forms the basis for traditional histopathology and thus contains invaluable morphological information. In this work, we developed a multimodal classification pipeline that uses deep learning, in the form of a pre-trained artificial neural network, to extract the meaningful morphological features from histopathological images, and combine it with the IMS data. To test whether this deep learning-based classification strategy can improve on our previous results in classification of melanocytic neoplasia, we utilized MALDI IMS data with collected serial H&E stained sections for 331 patients, and compared this multimodal classification pipeline to classifiers using either exclusively microscopy or IMS data. The multimodal pipeline achieved the best performance, with ROC-AUCs of 0.968 vs. 0.938 vs. 0.931 for the multimodal, unimodal microscopy and unimodal IMS pipelines respectively. Due to the use of a pre-trained network to perform the morphological feature extraction, this pipeline does not require any training on large amounts of microscopy data. As such, this framework can be readily applied to improve classification performance in other experimental settings where microscopy data is acquired in tandem with IMS experiments.

Indexed as

MelanomaSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationDeep LearningHumansMultimodal ImagingNeural Networks, ComputerSkin Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID38820337
PMCPMC11142536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.