Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38820324›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

The impact of accessibility to non-calcium-based phosphate binders and calcimimetics on mineral outcomes in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: A 10-year retrospective analysis of real-world data.

Sinee Disthabanchong, Panhathai Kasempin, Praopilad Srisuwarn, Payupol Chansomboon, Nuchcha Buachum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sinee DisthabanchongFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0326-731X
Panhathai KasempinFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Praopilad SrisuwarnFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Payupol ChansomboonFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nuchcha BuachumFaculty of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHyperphosphatemia and hyperparathyroidism are common in end-stage kidney disease and are associated with poor outcomes. In addition to adequate dialysis, medications are usually required for optimum control of serum phosphate and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels. The use of calcium-based phosphate binders (CBPBs) and active vitamin D is associated with an increase in serum calcium and worsening vascular calcification. To overcome these limitations, non-calcium-based phosphate binders (NCBPBs) and calcimimetics have been developed. However, the coverage for these new medications remains limited in several parts of the world due to the lack of patient-level outcome data and cost. The present study examined the differences in mineral outcomes between two main categories of healthcare programs that provided different coverage for medications used to control mineral and bone disorders (MBD). The Social Security/Universal Coverage (SS/UC) program covered only CBPBs and active vitamin D, whereas the Civil Servant/State Enterprise (CS/SE) program provided coverage of CBPBs, active vitamin D, NCBPBs, and calcimimetics.

methodsThis 10-year retrospective cohort study examined the differences in mineral outcomes between two healthcare programs in maintenance hemodialysis patients. The differences in serum calcium, phosphate, and PTH levels, as well as the aortic arch calcification score, were analyzed according to dialysis vintage by linear mixed-effects regression analyses. The difference in the composite outcome of severe hyperparathyroidism and parathyroidectomy was analyzed by the Cox-proportional hazard regression model.

results714 patients were included in the analyses (full cohort). Of these patients, 563 required at least one type of medication to control MBD (MBD medication subgroup). Serum calcium, phosphate, and the proportions of patients with hypercalcemia and hyperphosphatemia were substantially higher in the SS/UC group compared with the CS/SE group after appropriate adjustments for confounders in both the full cohort and the MBD medication subgroup. These findings were confirmed in propensity-score matched analyses. Higher parathyroid hormone levels and a higher rate of the composite endpoint of severe hyperparathyroidism and parathyroidectomy were also observed in the SS/UC group. A more rapid progression of aortic arch calcification was suggested in the SS/UC group, but between-group changes were not significant.

conclusionPatients under the healthcare program that did not cover the use of NCBPBs and calcimimetics showed higher serum calcium and phosphate levels and a more rapid progression of hyperparathyroidism. The difference in the progression of vascular calcification could not be confirmed in the present study.

Indexed as

Calcimimetic AgentsCalciumHyperphosphatemiaPhosphatesRenal DialysisAgedChelating AgentsFemaleHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedParathyroid HormoneRetrospective StudiesVitamin DCalcimimetic AgentsCalciumChelating AgentsParathyroid HormonePhosphatesVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID38820324
PMCPMC11142503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.