Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38820298›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Validation of a Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale: Dimensionality and factorial invariance.

Xiaoqin Zhu, Carman K M Chu, Xue Wu, Daniel T L Shek

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Cross-Lagged Analysis of Sleep Duration and Positive Youth Development in Primary and Secondary School Students].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaoqin ZhuDepartment of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, PR China.ORCID 0000-0002-5527-9729
Carman K M ChuDepartment of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, PR China.
Xue WuOffice of Undergraduate Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, PR China.
Daniel T L ShekDepartment of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, PR China.ORCID 0000-0003-3359-6229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For a multi-dimensional measure of positive youth development (PYD), its factor structure should be invariant across groups and over time. This study examined the factorial validity of the 44-item short form of the "Chinese Positive Youth Development Scale" (CPYDS-SF) that assesses 15 dimensions of PYD attributes. Using two waves of longitudinal data with a one-year interval in between, this study examined the factor structure of the scale and whether the structure is invariant between gender groups and across time. The data were collected from 3,328 adolescents at Wave 1 and 3,638 adolescents at Wave 2, with a matched sample of 2,905 adolescents (mean age = 12.57 ± 0.72 at Wave 1; 49.54% girls). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the 15-factor structure fitted the data well. The findings of invariance tests further supported this structure's invariance across gender and time, indicating a stable factor structure of CPYDS-SF among Chinese adolescents. These findings suggest that CPYDS-SF can be used to examine gender differences and the longitudinal development of PYD qualities among Chinese adolescents.

Indexed as

Adolescent DevelopmentAdolescentChildChinaEast Asian PeopleFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePsychometricsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38820298
PMCPMC11142590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.