Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38819821›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Optimal Oral Iron Therapy for Iron Deficiency Anemia Among US Veterans.

Nilang Patel, Scott G Silvey, Pradeep Arora, George M Feldman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nilang PatelDepartment of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
Scott G SilveyDivision of Nephrology, Central Virginia VA Healthcare System, Richmond.
Pradeep AroraDepartment of Medicine, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.
George M FeldmanDepartment of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Optimal oral iron supplementation strategy is unclear in patients with iron deficiency anemia (IDA) who have either normal kidney function (NKF) or chronic kidney disease (CKD). Objective: To investigate the association of different oral iron supplementation strategies with the change in hemoglobin and iron indices among patients with IDA with either NKF or CKD. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 2009 and 2019 at nationwide Veterans Health Administration facilities. Eligible participants included veterans with IDA (defined as hemoglobin <12 g/dL and either iron saturation <20% or ferritin <50 ng/mL) who received their first outpatient prescription of oral iron. Patients were further divided into those with NKF (estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥15 mL/min/1.73 m2 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m2). Data analysis was conducted from February to October 2023. Exposures: Patients were classified into 3 groups based on their oral iron dosing schedule: daily (once a day), multiple doses per day (MDD; ≥2 times per day), or alternate-day dose (ADD). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were change of hemoglobin, ferritin, total iron binding capacity (TIBC), and iron saturation (ISAT), which were calculated with linear mixed-effects models. Results: A total of 71 677 veterans with IDA (63 202 male [88.2%] and 8475 female [11.8%]; mean [SD] age, 68.47 [13.09] years), including 47 201 with NKF and 24 476 with CKD, were identifed. In patients with NKF in the daily group, hemoglobin increased from baseline (estimated per-30-day difference [SE], 0.27 [0.00] g/dL; P < .001). In comparison with the daily group, hemoglobin increased more in the MDD group (estimated per-30-day difference [SE], 0.08 [0.03] g/dL; P < .001), but no difference was noted in the ADD group (estimated per-30-day difference [SE], -0.01 [0.01] g/dL; P = .38). Ferritin, ISAT, and TIBC results were similar, except TIBC showed less change in the ADD group compared with the daily group. Patients with CKD showed similar trends but smaller magnitudes in changes. Among patients with NKF, the adjusted mean increase in hemoglobin was 1.03 g/dL (95% CI, 1.01-1.06 g/dL) for those in the daily group, 1.38 g/dL (95% CI, 1.36-1.40 g/dL) for those in the MDD group, and 0.93 g/dL (95% CI, 0.84-1.02 g/dL) for those in the ADD group at 90 days. Among patients with CKD, the adjusted mean increase in hemoglobin was 0.71 g/dL (95% CI, 0.68-0.73 g/dL) for those in the daily group, 0.99 g/dL (95% CI, 0.97-1.01 g/dL) for those in the MDD group, and 0.62 g/dL (95% CI, 0.52-0.73 g/dL) for those in the ADD group at 90 days. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective cohort study of veterans with IDA, there was no significant difference in the improvement of hemoglobin and iron indices between daily and ADD groups, but quickest improvement was observed in the MDD group. These findings suggest that the choice of oral iron therapy should depend on the rapidity of response desired and patient preference due to adverse effects.

Indexed as

Anemia, Iron-DeficiencyVeteransAdministration, OralAgedFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHemoglobinsHumansIronMaleMiddle AgedRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesHemoglobinsIron

Identifiers

PMID38819821
PMCPMC11143460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.