Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38819719›Full record

ArticlePharmacoEconomics2024

Comparing Generic Paediatric Health-Related Quality-of-Life Instruments: A Dimensionality Assessment Using Factor Analysis.

Mina Bahrampour, Renee Jones, Kim Dalziel, Nancy Devlin, Brendan Mulhern, QUOKKA (Quality of Life in Kids: Key Evidence for Decision Makers in Australia) Team

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PharmacoEconomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Assessing the dimensionality of the EQ-HWB-25 alongside EQ-5D-5L, QOL-ACC and ASCOT in an older adult population.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Psychometric properties of the Hebrew KIDSCREEN 52, 27 and 10 items: a cross-sectional study of self and parents reports in youth with and without physical disabilities.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mina BahrampourCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. mina.bahrampour@uts.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6915-1865
Renee JonesHealth Economics Unit, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5332-5226
Kim DalzielHealth Economics Unit, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4972-8871
Nancy DevlinHealth Economics Unit, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1561-5361
Brendan MulhernCentre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation (CHERE), University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3656-8063
QUOKKA (Quality of Life in Kids: Key Evidence for Decision Makers in Australia) Team

Funding

Australian Government Medical Research Futures Fund (MRFF) 1200816EuroQol Research Foundation 361-RA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWidely used generic instruments to measure paediatric health-related quality of life (HRQoL) include the EQ-5D-Y-5L, Child Health Utility 9 Dimension (CHU-9D), Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) and Health Utilities Index (HUI). There are similarities and differences in the content of these instruments, but there is little empirical evidence on how the items they contain relate to each other, and to an overarching model of HRQoL derived from their content.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore the dimensionality of the instruments using exploratory factor analysis (EFA).

methodsData from the Australian Paediatric Multi-Instrument Comparison (P-MIC) Study were used. EQ-5D-Y-5L, CHU-9D, PedsQL and HUI data were collected via proxy or child self-report data. EFA was used to investigate the underlying domain structure and measurement relationship. Items from the four instruments were pooled and domain models were identified for self- and proxy-reported data. The number of factors was determined based on eigenvalues greater than 1. A correlation cut-off of 0.32 was used to determine item loading on a given factor, with cross-loading also considered. Oblique rotation was used.

resultsResults suggest a six-factor structure for the proxy-reported data, including emotional functioning, pain, daily activities, physical functioning, school functioning, and senses, while the self-report data revealed a similar seven-factor structure, with social functioning emerging as an additional factor.

conclusionWe provide evidence of differences and similarities between paediatric HRQoL instruments and the aspects of health being measured by these instruments. The results identified slight differences between self- and proxy-reported data in the relationships among items within the resulting domains.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdolescentAustraliaChildChild HealthChild, PreschoolFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHealth StatusHumansMalePsychometricsSelf ReportSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID38819719
PMCPMC11169043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.