Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38819643›Full record

ArticleClinical neuroradiology2024

Nimodipine as Vasodilator in Guide Catheter Flush to Prevent Vasospasm During Endovascular Stroke Treatment.

Louisa J Sommer, Jessica Jesser, Omid Nikoubashman, Thanh N Nguyen, Joao Pinho, Arno Reich, Martin Wiesmann, Charlotte S Weyland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Louisa J SommerDepartment of Neuroradiology, Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-4536-4799
Jessica JesserDepartment of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Omid NikoubashmanDepartment of Neuroradiology, Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Thanh N NguyenInterventional Neurology and Neuroradiology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Joao PinhoDepartment of Neurology, Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Arno ReichDepartment of Neurology, Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Martin WiesmannDepartment of Neuroradiology, Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Charlotte S WeylandDepartment of Neuroradiology, Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany. cweyland@ukaachen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1374-7854

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe clinical importance and management of vasospasm as a complication during endovascular stroke treatment (EVT) has not been well studied. We sought to investigate the effect of adding nimodipine to the guiding catheter flush (GCF) to prevent vasospasm during EVT.

methodsThis is a single-center retrospective analysis including patients with EVT (stent-retriever and/or distal aspiration) treated for anterior or posterior circulation intracranial vessel occlusion from January 2018 to June 2023. Exclusion criteria were intracranial or extracranial stenosis, intra-arterial alteplase, patient age over 80 years. Study groups were patients with (nimo+) and without (nimo-) nimodipine in the GCF. They were compared for occurrence of vasospasm as primary endpoint and clinical outcome in univariate analysis.

results477 patients were included in the analysis (nimo+ n = 94 vs. nimo- n = 383). Nimo+ patients experienced less vasospasm during EVT (e.g. vasospasm in target vessel n (%): nimo- = 113 (29.6) vs. nimo+ = 9 (9.6), p < 0.001; extracranial vasospasm, n (%): nimo- = 68 (17.8) vs. nimo+ = 7 (7.4), p = 0.017). Patients of the two study groups had a comparable clinical outcome (90 day mRS, median (IQR): 3 (1-6) for both groups, p = 0.896). In general, patients with anterior circulation target vessel occlusion (TVO) experienced more vasospasm (anterior circ. TVO 38.7% vs. posterior circ. 7.5%, p = 0.006).

conclusionProphylactic adding of nimodipine reduces the risk of vasospasm during EVT without affecting the clinical outcome. Patients with anterior circulation TVO experienced more vasospasm compared to posterior circulation TVO.

Indexed as

Endovascular ProceduresNimodipineVasodilator AgentsVasospasm, IntracranialAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesStrokeNimodipineVasodilator AgentsCalcium channel blockerComplicationMechanical thrombectomyNimodipineVasospasm

Identifiers

PMID38819643
PMCPMC11564371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.