ReviewThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2022
High-definition intravascular ultrasound: current clinical uses.
Review in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Apples and Oranges: Comparing High-definition Intravascular Ultrasound and Optical Coherence Tomography.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Reply to Letter to the Editor: "Unmet Need for Deep Diving into Intracoronary Imaging".Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- High-Frequency 64-Element Ring-Annular Array Transducer: Development and Preclinical Validation for Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Identification of Coronary Healed Plaque Using a Combined High-Definition 35-65 MHz Intravascular Ultrasound and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.Korean circulation journal · 2024Article
- Silicon photonic acoustic detector (SPADE) using a silicon nitride microring resonator.Photoacoustics · 2023Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) provides grayscale images of the entire vessel wall, and its technology has recently been improved, resulting in more accurate tissue characterization. Compared with conventional IVUS, high-definition (HD) IVUS provides better resolution, better image quality, faster acquisition and integration of processing tools for more efficient cath lab workflow. HD-IVUS includes transducers with higher frequencies (≥ 45 MHz), allowing a higher near field resolution combined with enough tissue penetration for a more precise assessment of the entire vessel wall. HD-IVUS preserves the potential advantages of conventional (40 MHz) IVUS over optical coherence tomography by adding a substantially higher spatial resolution. For this reason, this technology has generated increasing interest among interventional cardiologists and researchers to provide better detailed morphological evaluation on complicated plaques in acute coronary syndrome patients and better stent optimization. In this review, we provide the state-of-the-art on this technology and its current clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38819587What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.