Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38819557›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2024

Methods for Pangenomic Core Detection.

Tizian Schulz, Luca Parmigiani, Andreas Rempel, Jens Stoye

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tizian SchulzFaculty of Technology and Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Luca ParmigianiFaculty of Technology and Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Andreas RempelFaculty of Technology and Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Jens StoyeFaculty of Technology and Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany. jens.stoye@uni-bielefeld.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational pangenomics deals with the joint analysis of all genomic sequences of a species. It has already been successfully applied to various tasks in many research areas. Further advances in DNA sequencing technologies constantly let more and more genomic sequences become available for many species, leading to an increasing attractiveness of pangenomic studies. At the same time, larger datasets also pose new challenges for data structures and algorithms that are needed to handle the data. Efficient methods oftentimes make use of the concept of k-mers.Core detection is a common way of analyzing a pangenome. The pangenome's core is defined as the subset of genomic information shared among all individual members. Classically, it is not only determined on the abstract level of genes but can also be described on the sequence level.In this chapter, we provide an overview of k-mer-based methods in the context of pangenomics studies. We first revisit existing software solutions for k-mer counting and k-mer set representation. Afterward, we describe the usage of two k-mer-based approaches, Pangrowth and Corer, for pangenomic core detection.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyGenomicsSoftwareHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSequence Analysis, DNAComparative genomicsCore genome analysisk-mer-based methodsPangenomics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.