Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38819532›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2024

Multiple administrations of bovine-appeasing substance during a 42-d preconditioning program followed by feedlot receiving and its effects on physiologic, health, and performance responses of feeder cattle.

Keenan Kvamme, Rodrigo S Marques, Vinicius Alves Cruz, Arnaldo Limede Cintra, Makayla Anne Ogg, Sarah R McCoski, Christian J Posbergh, Amanda N Bradbery, Vitor R G Mercadante, Shea J Mackey and 2 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects of feeding aTranslational animal science · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Keenan KvammeDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.
Rodrigo S MarquesSchool of Animal Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4590-2898
Vinicius Alves CruzSchool of Animal Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Arnaldo Limede CintraSchool of Animal Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Makayla Anne OggDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.
Sarah R McCoskiDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.
Christian J PosberghDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1458-7688
Amanda N BradberyDepartment of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA.
Vitor R G MercadanteSchool of Animal Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
Shea J MackeyDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Autumn T PickettDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.
Reinaldo F CookeDepartment of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77845, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This experiment evaluated the effects of multiple bovine-appeasing substance (BAS) administration during a 42-d preconditioning program followed by a feedlot receiving period on productivity, health, and physiological variables of feeder cattle. Ninety calves were weaned, weighed, loaded into a livestock trailer, transported for 70 km, and unloaded at the Bozeman Agricultural Research and Teaching Farm for a 42-d preconditioning program. Upon arrival, calf body weight (BW) was recorded again, and both pre- and post-transport BWs were averaged and used as calf weaning initial BW. Calves were ranked by BW, sex, and age in a completely randomized design and assigned to receive 1) multiple administrations of BAS at weaning (day 0), days 14, 28, and before transport and feedlot entry (day 42; BAS; RSEA Group, Quartier Salignan, France; n = 9 pens/treatment), or 2) placebo (diethylene glycol monoethyl ether; CON; n = 9 pens/treatment). Treatments (5 mL) were applied to the nuchal skin area of each animal during the preconditioning period. Calves within treatment groups were ranked again by initial BW, sex, and age, in a manner that pens have similar initial BW, age, and three steers and two heifers and allocated to 1 of the18 drylot pens. On day 42, calves were combined within the treatment group, loaded into two different single double-deck commercial livestock trailers, and transported for 1,000 km (approximately 16 h). Upon arrival (day 43), calves were unloaded at the same feedyard. Blood samples were collected on days 0, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, 42, 43, 46, 50, 57, 64, and 90. Average daily gain, final BW, and feed efficiency did not differ (P > 0.52) between BAS and CON calves in the preconditioning and receiving phases. A treatment × day interaction was detected (P < 0.001) for plasma haptoglobin concentrations, which was greater (P < 0.01) in CON on days 3 and 7 vs. BAS calves. During the preconditioning phase, serum NEFA concentration was reduced (P < 0.01) in BAS on day 3 compared with CON calves. A treatment × day interaction was detected (P = 0.001) for exit velocity, which was greater (P < 0.001) for CON vs. BAS calves on days 3, 7, 14, and 21 during the preconditioning phase and on day 46 of the receiving phase. Therefore, Applications of BAS reduced immunological responses and exit velocity associated with stress caused by management practices, but did not improve performance during the preconditioning and receiving phases.

Indexed as

Animal HusbandryAnimalsCattleFemaleMaleRandom AllocationTransportationWeaningappeasing substancebeef calvesperformancestressweaning

Identifiers

PMID38819532
PMCPMC11185958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.