ArticleNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2025
A Novel Closed-Loop Electrical Brain Stimulation Device Featuring Wireless Low-Energy Ultrasound Power and Communication.
Article in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to indicate the feasibility of a prototype electrical neuromodulation system using a closed-loop energy-efficient ultrasound-based mechanism for communication, data transmission, and recharging. MATERIALS AND
methodsClosed-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) prototypes were designed and fabricated with ultrasonic wideband (UsWB) communication technology and miniaturized custom electronics. Two devices were implanted short term in anesthetized Göttingen minipigs (N = 2). Targeting was performed using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, and locations were confirmed postoperatively by computerized tomography. DBS systems were tested over a wide range of stimulation settings to mimic minimal, typical, and/or aggressive clinical settings, and evaluated for their ability to transmit data through scalp tissue and to recharge the DBS system using UsWB.
resultsStimulation, communication, reprogramming, and recharging protocols were successfully achieved in both subjects for amplitude (1V-6V), frequency (50-250 Hz), and pulse width (60-200 μs) settings and maintained for ≥six hours. The precision of pulse settings was verified with <5% error. Communication rates of 64 kbit/s with an error rate of 0.05% were shown, with no meaningful throughput degradation observed. Time to recharge to 80% capacity was <9 minutes. Two DBS systems also were implanted in the second test animal, and independent bilateral stimulation was successfully shown.
conclusionsThe system performed at clinically relevant implant depths and settings. Independent bilateral stimulation for the duration of the study with a 4F energy storage and full rapid recharge were achieved. Continuous function extrapolates to six days of continuous stimulation in future design iterations implementing application specific integrated circuit level efficiency and 15F storage capacitance. UsWB increases energy efficiency, reducing storage requirements and thereby enabling device miniaturization. The device can enable intelligent closed-loop stimulation, remote system monitoring, and optimization and can serve as a power/data gateway to interconnect the intrabody network with the Internet of Medical Things.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.