Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38819326›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2024

Action against birth defects: if not now, when?

Kathleen Strong, Judith Robb-McCord, Salimah Walani, Cecilia Mellado, Lorenzo D Botto, Guillermo Lay-Son, Theresa Diaz, Tahmina Banu, Kokila Lakhoo, Anshu Banerjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Global inequity in pediatric and congenital heart care-is it economics or inertia?Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kathleen StrongDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Aging Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8092-1955
Judith Robb-McCordIndependent (formerly March of Dimes), Chapel Hill, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4868-1189
Salimah WalaniMiracleFeet, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5529-2897
Cecilia MelladoSchool of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-6032-4651
Lorenzo D BottoDept. of Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5322-7116
Guillermo Lay-SonSchool of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Theresa DiazDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Aging Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5063-8078
Tahmina BanuChittagong Research Institute for Children's Surgery, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0003-3230-3973
Kokila LakhooUniversity of Oxford and Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1840-708X
Anshu BanerjeeDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health and Aging Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6487-8793

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore children are surviving through interventions to address the infectious causes of under-5 mortality; subsequently, the proportion of deaths caused by birth defects is increasing. Prevention, diagnosis, treatment and care interventions for birth defects are available but are needed where the burden is highest, low-and-middle-income countries.

objectivesA selection of birth defect focused publications, conferences, and World Health Assembly resolutions from 2000 to 2017 show that global efforts were made to raise the profile of birth defects in global public health. However, recent donor support and national government interest has waned. Without concerted global action to improve primary prevention and care for children born with birth defects, the Sustainable Development Goal targets for child survival will not be met.

resultsBirth defects make up 8% and 10% of global under-5 and neonatal deaths respectively, making them significant contributors to preventable loss of life for children. Survivors face long-term morbidity and lifelong disability which compounds the health and economic woes of individuals, families, communities and society as a whole. Demographic changes in sub-Saharan Africa portend a growing number of births with 1.6 billion projected from 2021 to 2050. More births and better survival without effective prevention and treatment for birth defects translates into more mortality and disability from birth defects.

conclusionsWe recommend interventions for prevention of birth defects. These are evidenced-based and affordable, but require low- and middle-income countries to strengthened their health systems. Action against birth defects now will prevent premature deaths and long-term disability, and lead to stronger, more resilient health systems.

Indexed as

Congenital AbnormalitiesGlobal HealthChild MortalityChild, PreschoolDeveloping CountriesHumansInfantInfant, Newbornbirth defectsChild mortalitydisabilitynewborn mortalitysustainable development goals

Identifiers

PMID38819326
PMCPMC11146259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.