Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38819193›Full record

ArticleActa orthopaedica2024

Guideline for RSA and CT-RSA implant migration measurements: an update of standardizations and recommendations.

Bart L Kaptein, Bart Pijls, Lennard Koster, Johan Kärrholm, Maury Hull, Abby Niesen, Petra Heesterbeek, Stuart Callary, Matthew Teeter, Trevor Gascoyne and 8 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta orthopaedica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Bart L KapteinDepartment of Orthopedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. b.l.kaptein@lumc.nl.
Bart PijlsDepartment of Orthopedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Lennard KosterDepartment of Orthopedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Johan KärrholmDepartment of Orthopedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Maury HullOrthopedic Surgery Department, University of California, Davis, United States.
Abby NiesenOrthopedic Surgery Department, University of California, Davis, United States.
Petra HeesterbeekOrthopedic Research Department, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Stuart CallaryDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Matthew TeeterDepartment of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Canada.
Trevor GascoyneOrthopedic Innovation Centre, Winnipeg, Canada.
Stephan M RöhrlDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Gunnar FlivikDepartment of Orthopedics, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Laura BragonzoniLife Quality Studies, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Elise LaendeDepartment of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Olof SandbergSectra, Linköping, Sweden.
L Bogdan SolomonDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia.
Rob NelissenDepartment of Orthopedics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Maiken StillingDepartment of Orthopedics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opening remarks: These guidelines are the result of discussions within a diverse group of RSA researchers. They were approved in December 2023 by the board and selected members of the International Radiostereometry Society to update the guidelines by Valstar et al. [1]. By adhering to these guidelines, RSA studies will become more transparent and consistent in execution, presentation, reporting, and interpretation. Both authors and reviewers of scientific papers using RSA may use these guidelines, summarized in the Checklist, as a reference. Deviations from these guidelines should have the underlying rationale stated.

Indexed as

Radiostereometric AnalysisTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicProsthesis Failure

Identifiers

PMID38819193
PMCPMC11141406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.