Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38819146›Full record

ArticlemBio2024

Guild-level signature of gut microbiome for diabetic kidney disease.

Shasha Tang, Guojun Wu, Yalei Liu, Binghua Xue, Shihan Zhang, Weiwei Zhang, Yifan Jia, Qinyuan Xie, Chenghong Liang, Limin Wang and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Microbiota-gut-kidney axis in health and renal disease.International journal of biological sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Characterization of gut microbiota in patients with diabetic kidney disease.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microbiota and kidney disease: the road ahead.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Shasha Tang *Department of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1307-3124
Guojun Wu *Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology and New Jersey Institute for Food, Nutrition, and Health, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7910-2813
Yalei Liu *Department of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes, Zhengzhou, China.
Binghua XueDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes, Zhengzhou, China.
Shihan ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes, Zhengzhou, China.
Weiwei ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes, Zhengzhou, China.
Yifan JiaDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes, Zhengzhou, China.
Qinyuan XieDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes, Zhengzhou, China.
Chenghong LiangDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes, Zhengzhou, China.
Limin WangDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes, Zhengzhou, China.
Hongyan HengDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes, Zhengzhou, China.
Wei WeiDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiaoyang ShiDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes, Zhengzhou, China.
Yimeng HuDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes, Zhengzhou, China.
Junpeng YangDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes, Zhengzhou, China.
Lingyun ZhaoDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiaobing WangDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes, Zhengzhou, China.
Liping ZhaoDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology and New Jersey Institute for Food, Nutrition, and Health, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9694-7140
Huijuan YuanDepartment of Endocrinology, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Intestinal Microecology and Diabetes, Zhengzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0486-0994

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES005022 · NIEHS · UNIV OF MED/DENT NJ-R W JOHNSON MED SCH · PI PANOS G. GEORGOPOULOS · 1988 to 2026
$47.4M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current microbiome signatures for chronic diseases such as diabetic kidney disease (DKD) are mainly based on low-resolution taxa such as genus or phyla and are often inconsistent among studies. In microbial ecosystems, bacterial functions are strain specific, and taxonomically different bacteria tend to form co-abundance functional groups called guilds. Here, we identified guild-level signatures for DKD by performing in-depth metagenomic sequencing and conducting genome-centric and guild-based analysis on fecal samples from 116 DKD patients and 91 healthy subjects. Redundancy analysis on 1,543 high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes (HQMAGs) identified 54 HQMAGs that were differentially distributed among the young healthy control group, elderly healthy control group, early-stage DKD patients (EDG), and late-stage DKD patients (LDG). Co-abundance network analysis classified the 54 HQMAGs into two guilds. Compared to guild 2, guild 1 contained more short-chain fatty acid biosynthesis genes and fewer genes encoding uremic toxin indole biosynthesis, antibiotic resistance, and virulence factors. Guild indices, derived from the total abundance of guild members and their diversity, delineated DKD patients from healthy subjects and between different severities of DKD. Age-adjusted partial Spearman correlation analysis showed that the guild indices were correlated with DKD disease progression and with risk indicators of poor prognosis. We further validated that the random forest classification model established with the 54 HQMAGs was also applicable for classifying patients with end-stage renal disease and healthy subjects in an independent data set. Therefore, this genome-level, guild-based microbial analysis strategy may identify DKD patients with different severity at an earlier stage to guide clinical interventions. IMPORTANCE: Traditionally, microbiome research has been constrained by the reliance on taxonomic classifications that may not reflect the functional dynamics or the ecological interactions within microbial communities. By transcending these limitations with a genome-centric and guild-based analysis, our study sheds light on the intricate and specific interactions between microbial strains and diabetic kidney disease (DKD). We have unveiled two distinct microbial guilds with opposite influences on host health, which may redefine our understanding of microbial contributions to disease progression. The implications of our findings extend beyond mere association, providing potential pathways for intervention and opening new avenues for patient stratification in clinical settings. This work paves the way for a paradigm shift in microbiome research in DKD and potentially other chronic kidney diseases, from a focus on taxonomy to a more nuanced view of microbial ecology and function that is more closely aligned with clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

BacteriaDiabetic NephropathiesFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMetagenomeMetagenomicsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedDKDguildgut microbiome

Identifiers

PMID38819146
PMCPMC11253615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.