ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2024
From
Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Energy Deprivation Stress to Catalytic Adaptation of Reductive Dehalogenase TmrA for 1,1-DCA Dechlorination: An Experimental and in Silico Study.Microbial biotechnology · 2026Article
- Modeling reveals a metabolic basis of competition amongmSystems · 2025Article
- Complete metagenome-assembled genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025Article
- Deciphering reductive dehalogenase specificity through targeted mutagenesis of chloroalkane reductases.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- Two distinctMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024Article
- Pangenomic insights intoMicrobial genomics · 2024Article
- MecE, MecB, and MecC proteins orchestrate methyl group transfer during dichloromethane fermentation.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- Metagenomic sequences from anaerobic chloroform and dichloromethane degrading microbial communities.Microbiology resource announcements · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chloroform (CF) and dichloromethane (DCM) are groundwater contaminants of concern due to their high toxicity and inhibition of important biogeochemical processes such as methanogenesis. Anaerobic biotransformation of CF and DCM has been well documented but typically independently of one another. CF is the electron acceptor for certain organohalide-respiring bacteria that use reductive dehalogenases (RDases) to dechlorinate CF to DCM. In contrast, known DCM degraders use DCM as their electron donor, which is oxidized using a series of methyltransferases and associated proteins encoded by the IMPORTANCE: Chloroform (CF) and dichloromethane (DCM) are regulated groundwater contaminants. A cost-effective approach to remove these pollutants from contaminated groundwater is to employ microbes that transform CF and DCM as part of their metabolism, thus depleting the contamination as the microbes continue to grow. In this work, we investigate bioaugmentation culture SC05, a mixed microbial consortium that effectively and simultaneously degrades both CF and DCM coupled to the growth of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.