Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38819109›Full record

ArticleJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2025

Precision diagnostics in paediatric dermatology: Advancing management of tinea capitis through dermatophyte PCR.

M Theiler, I Luchsinger, A C Rast, A Schwieger-Briel, L Weibel, P P Bosshard

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Consensus-based Guideline on tinea capitis.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Precision diagnostics in paediatric dermatology: Advancing management of tinea capitis through dermatophyte PCR.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M TheilerDermatology Department, Pediatric Skin Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7160-3958
I LuchsingerDermatology Department, Pediatric Skin Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7725-8171
A C RastDermatology Department, Pediatric Skin Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
A Schwieger-BrielDermatology Department, Pediatric Skin Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
L WeibelDermatology Department, Pediatric Skin Center, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
P P BosshardDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1154-2281

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTinea capitis (TC) is the most frequent dermatophyte infection in children requiring systemic and topical treatment for several weeks. Traditionally, diagnosis and treatment monitoring were based on microscopic examination and fungal culture of scales and plucked hairs, which both have significant limitations.

objectivesTo investigate the role of dermatophyte polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in the treatment of TC.

methodsScales and plucked hairs of children with TC were investigated by dermatophyte PCR, microscopic examination and fungal culture at baseline and during antifungal treatment.

resultsSeventeen children with TC were included. At baseline, sensitivity of PCR was 100% as compared to 60% and 87% for direct microscopy and fungal culture, respectively. Species identification by PCR and fungal culture was consistent in all cases. During follow-up, analysis of 38 samples under treatment showed a sensitivity of PCR, direct microscopy and fungal culture of 68%, 26% and 89% while specificity was 84%, 100% and 100%, respectively. PCR during therapy proved to be false-negative in six and false-positive in three instances. The latter turned negative after 4 weeks without further systemic treatment.

conclusionsDermatophyte PCR is an excellent tool for baseline diagnostics of TC providing rapid and accurate results. Our findings suggest that due to the fast and reliable results, it may replace direct microscopy and fungal culture to confirm or exclude TC in children. In the treatment course, diagnostic accuracy and performance of PCR seem reduced as compared to fungal culture, limiting its value for treatment monitoring. Mycological cure ascertained by fungal culture should currently remain the therapeutic goal.

Indexed as

ArthrodermataceaeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicroscopyPolymerase Chain ReactionTinea CapitisAdolescentAntifungal AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDermatologyFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHairHumansInfantAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID38819109
PMCPMC11760770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.