Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38818482›Full record

ReviewmLife2022

Guided by the principles of microbiome engineering: Accomplishments and perspectives for environmental use.

Haiyang Hu, Miaoxiao Wang, Yiqun Huang, Zhaoyong Xu, Ping Xu, Yong Nie, Hongzhi Tang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The role of Micro-biome engineering in enhancing Food safety and quality.Biotechnology notes (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. The evolution of autonomy from two cooperative specialists in fluctuating environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haiyang HuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, and School of Life Sciences & Biotechnology Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai China.
Miaoxiao WangDepartment of Environmental Systems Science ETH Zürich Zürich Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4636-0058
Yiqun HuangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, and School of Life Sciences & Biotechnology Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai China.
Zhaoyong XuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, and School of Life Sciences & Biotechnology Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai China.
Ping XuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, and School of Life Sciences & Biotechnology Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai China.ORCID 0000-0002-4418-9680
Yong NieCollege of Engineering Peking University Beijing China.
Hongzhi TangState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, and School of Life Sciences & Biotechnology Shanghai Jiao Tong University Shanghai China.ORCID 0000-0002-7743-0186

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the accomplishments of microbiome engineering highlight its significance for the targeted manipulation of microbial communities, knowledge and technical gaps still limit the applications of microbiome engineering in biotechnology, especially for environmental use. Addressing the environmental challenges of refractory pollutants and fluctuating environmental conditions requires an adequate understanding of the theoretical achievements and practical applications of microbiome engineering. Here, we review recent cutting-edge studies on microbiome engineering strategies and their classical applications in bioremediation. Moreover, a framework is summarized for combining both top-down and bottom-up approaches in microbiome engineering toward improved applications. A strategy to engineer microbiomes for environmental use, which avoids the build-up of toxic intermediates that pose a risk to human health, is suggested. We anticipate that the highlighted framework and strategy will be beneficial for engineering microbiomes to address difficult environmental challenges such as degrading multiple refractory pollutants and sustain the performance of engineered microbiomes in situ with indigenous microorganisms under fluctuating conditions.

Indexed as

bioremediationenergy productionenvironmental microbiologymicrobiome engineering

Identifiers

PMID38818482
PMCPMC10989833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.