Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38818419›Full record

ArticleEvolution letters2024

Exploring polymorphism in a palatable prey: predation risk and frequency dependence in relation to distinct levels of conspicuousness.

Riccardo Poloni, Marina Dhennin, Johanna Mappes, Mathieu Joron, Ossi Nokelainen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Antagonistic effects of predator color morph abundance and saliency on prey anti-predator responses.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Riccardo PoloniEvolutionary and Behavioural Ecology Department-CEFE, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6249-0733
Marina DhenninEvolutionary and Behavioural Ecology Department-CEFE, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Johanna MappesOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Program, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Mathieu JoronEvolutionary and Behavioural Ecology Department-CEFE, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Ossi NokelainenOrganismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Program, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0278-6698

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Camouflage and warning signals are different antipredator strategies, which offer an excellent opportunity to study the evolutionary forces acting on prey appearance. Edible prey often escape detection via camouflage, which usually leads to apostatic selection favoring rare morphs. By contrast, defended prey often display conspicuous coloration acting as warning signals to predators, which usually leads to positive frequency dependence and signal uniformity. However, when two morphs of the same species vary greatly in conspicuousness, the maintenance of both cryptic and conspicuous forms in profitable prey populations remains enigmatic. Using the white and melanic morphs of the invasive box tree moth (

Indexed as

color evolutioncrypsisevolutionary ecologyinvasion ecologypredation

Identifiers

PMID38818419
PMCPMC11134470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.