ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
A prognostic nomogram for the cancer-specific survival rate of choroidal melanoma using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Competing risk analysis of prognosis in patients with uveal melanoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- A nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival of ocular melanoma.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Development of a prognostic nomogram for ocular melanoma: a SEER population-based study (2000-2021).Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study was conducted to develop a comprehensive nomogram for individuals with choroidal melanoma (CM) to determine their cancer-specific survival (CSS). Methods: Data of individuals with CM, diagnosed between 2004 and 2015, were accessed at the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The selected individuals were randomly categorized into a training and validation cohort. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was applied to screen the relevant variables. Followed by the development of a nomogram based on independent variables. Ultimately, the net reclassification index (NRI), concordance index (C-index), calibration charts, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), area under the curve (AUC), and decision-curve analysis (DCA), were utilized to evaluate the discrimination, accuracy, and effectiveness of the model. Results: This study enrolled 3,782 patients. Seven independent factors linked to prognosis were screened via multivariate Cox regression analysis, encompassing age at diagnosis; race; AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) stage; histologic type; and therapy method of radiotherapy, surgery, and chemotherapy. The respective C-indexes of the training and validation cohorts were 0.709 and 0.726, indicative of the excellent accuracy of the nomogram. Furthermore, the AUCs of the training and validation cohorts across 3, 5, and 8 years were 0.767, 0.744, and 0.722 as well as 0.772, 0.770, and 0.753, respectively. Evident of the superiority of the established nomogram over the AJCC staging, both the NRI and IDI values exhibited improvement. The favorable clinical impact and good performance of the nomogram were evident via decision curve analyses (DCAs) and calibration plots, respectively. Conclusion: This research dealt with establishing and validating a nomogram as a prognostic tool for assessing the prognosis of adult patients with CM utilizing the SEER database. A comprehensive assessment of the nomogram via diverse variables demonstrated its accuracy in predicting the CSS probabilities of CM patients across 3, 5, and 8 years in clinical settings. Notably, its performance surpassed that of the AJCC staging system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.