Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38818378›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024

Cross-species variability in lobular geometry and cytochrome P450 hepatic zonation: insights into CYP1A2, CYP2D6, CYP2E1 and CYP3A4.

Mohamed Albadry, Jonas Küttner, Jan Grzegorzewski, Olaf Dirsch, Eva Kindler, Robert Klopfleisch, Vaclav Liska, Vladimira Moulisova, Sandra Nickel, Richard Palek and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A comprehensive review ofMedicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Mohamed AlbadryDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Experimental Transplantation Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Jonas KüttnerDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Experimental Transplantation Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Jan GrzegorzewskiInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Institute für Biologie, Systems Medicine of the Liver, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Olaf DirschInstitute for Pathology, BG Klinikum Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Eva KindlerDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Robert KlopfleischDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Vaclav LiskaBiomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia.
Vladimira MoulisovaBiomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia.
Sandra NickelClinic and Polyclinic for Visceral, Transplantation, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Leipzig University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany.
Richard PalekBiomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia.
Jachym RosendorfBiomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czechia.
Sylvia SaalfeldInstitute of Biomedical Engineering and Informatics, Ilmenau University of Technology, Ilmenau, Germany.
Utz SettmacherDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Hans-Michael TautenhahnDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Experimental Transplantation Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
Matthias KönigInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Institute für Biologie, Systems Medicine of the Liver, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Uta DahmenDepartment of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Experimental Transplantation Surgery, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a lack of systematic research exploring cross-species variation in liver lobular geometry and zonation patterns of critical drug-metabolizing enzymes, a knowledge gap essential for translational studies. This study investigated the critical interplay between lobular geometry and key cytochrome P450 (CYP) zonation in four species: mouse, rat, pig, and human. We developed an automated pipeline based on whole slide images (WSI) of hematoxylin-eosin-stained liver sections and immunohistochemistry. This pipeline allows accurate quantification of both lobular geometry and zonation patterns of essential CYP proteins. Our analysis of CYP zonal expression shows that all CYP enzymes (besides CYP2D6 with panlobular expression) were observed in the pericentral region in all species, but with distinct differences. Comparison of normalized gradient intensity shows a high similarity between mice and humans, followed by rats. Specifically, CYP1A2 was expressed throughout the pericentral region in mice and humans, whereas it was restricted to a narrow pericentral rim in rats and showed a panlobular pattern in pigs. Similarly, CYP3A4 is present in the pericentral region, but its extent varies considerably in rats and appears panlobular in pigs. CYP2D6 zonal expression consistently shows a panlobular pattern in all species, although the intensity varies. CYP2E1 zonal expression covered the entire pericentral region with extension into the midzone in all four species, suggesting its potential for further cross-species analysis. Analysis of lobular geometry revealed an increase in lobular size with increasing species size, whereas lobular compactness was similar. Based on our results, zonated CYP expression in mice is most similar to humans. Therefore, mice appear to be the most appropriate species for drug metabolism studies unless larger species are required for other purposes, e.g., surgical reasons. CYP selection should be based on species, with CYP2E1 and CYP2D6 being the most preferable to compare four species. CYP1A2 could be considered as an additional CYP for rodent versus human comparisons, and CYP3A4 for mouse/human comparisons. In conclusion, our image analysis pipeline together with suggestions for species and CYP selection can serve to improve future cross-species and translational drug metabolism studies.

Indexed as

cytochrome P450drug metabolismglutamine synthetaseimage analysisinterspeciesliver lobular geometrymetabolic zonation

Identifiers

PMID38818378
PMCPMC11137285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.