Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38818371›Full record

ArticleBrain, behavior, & immunity - health2024

So what I'm stressed? A qualitative study examininga caregivers' reactions to emerging biomarkers of stress.

Timothy S Sannes, Tamar Parmet, Miryam Yusufov, Jodi Sutherland, Jennifer Stefanik, Nicole Andrade, Tamryn F Gray, Ilana M Braun, William F Pirl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain, behavior, & immunity - health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Timothy S SannesUMass Memorial Cancer Center, Department of Psychiatry, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
Tamar ParmetUniversity of Colorado-Denver, Department of Psychology, Denver, CO, USA.
Miryam YusufovDana Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jodi SutherlandDana Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer StefanikDana Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Nicole AndradeDana Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Tamryn F GrayDana Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ilana M BraunDana Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
William F PirlDana Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Caregivers of adults with cancer often report significant distress yet remain difficult to engage in supportive services. While the field of Psychosomatic Medicine has continued to identify important markers of physiologic stress, and demonstrated disruption in these markers in caregiver populations, no research has investigated whether biomarker information on caregivers' reaction to stress could impact their willingness to address their ongoing distress. Methods: Here, we report on a qualitative study ( Results: Analysis utilizing the framework method revealed four emerging themes. The first theme described caregivers' ability to manage stress and willingness to engage with supportive services. Second, caregivers generally accepted the biomarker data but preferred it to be presented in a specific way. The third theme demonstrated that for some, biomarker data may actually increase their subjective distress (e.g., whether or not something could be done to improve their mental state). The last theme described how biomarkers were generally received as meaningful motivators that could increase caregivers' willingness to engage with supportive services. Conclusions: In addition to the more general identified theme of CG's willingness to engage with additional support, we gained insights into caregivers' reaction to the stress biomarkers presented. Findings will set the stage for the utility of stress biomarker information and whether it influences cancer caregivers' willingness to address their distress and motivation to engage in supportive services.

Identifiers

PMID38818371
PMCPMC11137355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.