ArticleJournal of cardiovascular echography
Does Speckle Tracking Transthoracic Echocardiography Indicate Subtle Changes in Left Ventricular Function in Heart Failure Patients with Reduced Ejection Fraction Treated by Sacubitril-valsartan?
Article in Journal of cardiovascular echography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In heart failure patients and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), assessing subtle changes in left ventricle (LV) function is crucial for monitoring treatment efficacy. This study aims to determine the effect of valsartan/sacubitril on LV ejection fraction (EF) assessed by two-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in comparison to that assessed by 2D TTE speckle tracking in patients with HFrEF ≤35% after 6 months of treatment. Patients and Methods: A prospective study will be conducted on 200 heart failure patients with reduced EF (HFrEF) undergoing sacubitril-valsartan treatment. Each participant underwent a comprehensive evaluation, including physical examination, history taking, serial 12-lead electrocardiogram, and 2D echo to evaluate cardiac parameters. In addition, 2D speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) assessments were conducted before and after 6 months of valsartan/sacubitril treatment. Results: The enrolled patients had an average age of 48 years with 63% females. At the beginning of the study, 9 (4.5%) patients were classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) FC I, 120 (60%) as NYHA FC II, 64 (32%) as NYHA FC III, and 7 (3.5%) as FC IV. Following treatment, 82 (41%) patients improved to NYHA FC I, and 118 (59%) were in NYHA FC II. Notably, 82 (41%) patients showed improved left ventricular EF (LVEF), detected either by traditional TTE or STE, whereas 118 (59%) showed no improvement in EF through traditional TTE. In addition, 74 (37%) patients demonstrated improvement detected by STE. In contrast, 44 (22%) patients demonstrated no improvement in EF detected by either TTE or STE. Conclusion: STE was a more reliable diagnostic method for seeing early LVEF improvement in patients with HFrEF receiving valsartan/sacubitril treatment not seen by conventional TTE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.