Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38818307›Full record

ArticleMedical research archives2024

Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and Satisfaction with Self-Sampling among Black Women in Michigan: a Mixed Methods Study.

Elizabeth Haro, Emma A Butcher, Martha L Alves, Christelle El Khoury, Alexandra Vinson, Diane M Harper

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical research archives, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Characterizing Cervical Cancer Screening in the US: Preparing for the Era of Self-Collection.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth HaroDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0003-3595-5432
Emma A ButcherDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-3729-4159
Martha L AlvesDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0001-6772-6306
Christelle El KhouryDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 000-0002-2562-4800
Alexandra VinsonDepartment of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-9062-7899
Diane M HarperDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0001-7648-883X

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Eric R. Fearon · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR)UM1TR004404 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Julie C Lumeng · 2023 to 2026
$39.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004404NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In recent years, cervical cancer screening among Black women in the United States has declined, followed by increased incidence and mortality. We aim to evaluate the individual, sociocultural, and structural barriers to cervical cancer screening in relationship to the exam technique barriers. Methods: Participants received cervical cancer self-screening kits in the mail. They returned their samples and a quantitative survey developed from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) modules designed to address the known individual, sociocultural, and structural barriers to screening. We established the fourteen attributes of cervical cancer screening techniques from prior work. Participants then shared their experiences in a semi-structured qualitative interview informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to explore the answers to the survey questions. We coded themes from the interviews. Women were grouped as younger (30-45 years) and older (46-65 years). Results: Of the 41 women completing the study, 21 were in the younger age group (mean 37.3, SD 4.7), and 20 were in the older age group (56.5 (5.5)). All participants self-identified as African American/Black and were due for cervical cancer screening. Women indicated that individual, sociocultural, and structural barriers influenced their cervical cancer screening, but the most significant barrier was the speculum-based technique itself. Three positive attributes and eight negative attributes significantly differed by screening technique, favoring the self-screening technique. Conclusions: The self-screening technique for screening for cervical cancer is feasible and acceptable to this group of Black women.

Indexed as

adultAfrican AmericanBarriers to cervical cancer screeningBlackHINTSHPVmixed methodspatient preferences for physician characteristicsself-sampling for cervical cancer screeningspeculum examTheoretical Domain Frameworkunder-screenedwomen

Identifiers

PMID38818307
PMCPMC11138408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.