ArticlePractical laboratory medicine2024
The Italian external quality assessment program for Cystic Fibrosis sweat chloride test: CFTR modulators and the impact of a new sweat test report form.
Article in Practical laboratory medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The advent of CFTR modulators highlighted that the sweat test (ST) for CF can be used also as an outcome measure for the basic defect of CFTR. Despite the technological advances, ST still remains operator-dependent and its execution should be strongly paired with guidelines. In 2022, due to the advent of CFTR modulators, the Italian CF Society introduced a specific ST report. The aim of the present paper is to discuss the impact of this new report in the 2022-23 round of the Italian External Quality Assessment program for ST (I-EQA-SCT). Methods: The scheme of the I-EQA-SCT is prospective, enrolment is voluntary, the payment of a fee is required and results are shared through a web-facility. Assessment covers analysis, interpretation, and reporting of results. In the 2022-23 round, 2 out of the 3 mock clinical information referred to patients who started modulators. Results: Fourteen laboratories completed the 2022-23 I-EQA-SCT round. Three of them failed in the interpretation of results from these two mock cases and/or used a wrong report not consistent with the more recent Italian Sweat Test Recommendations. Conclusions: The overall results obtained from the laboratories involved in the I-EQA-SCT program clearly showed that the laboratories' qualitative and quantitative performance improved significantly. Results emerged from this round highlighted an issue in the report form used for monitoring patients on CFTR modulator therapy thus stressing the importance of these programs in improving both the performance of lab services and ameliorating the sweat test recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.