ArticleHeliyon2024
Association of serum uric acid level with intracranial aneurysms: A Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spontaneous intracranial artery dissection: risk factors, clinical features and imaging features.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- The prognostic significance of uric acid to albumin ratio in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage following surgical clipping or endovascular interventions: insights from a large cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Numerous studies have posited the involvement of serum uric acid (SUA) in the pathogenesis and progression of various cardiovascular diseases, particularly aortic aneurysms. However, the casual effect of SUA level on intracranial aneurysms (IAs) was rarely studied. Consequently, we aimed to explore the causal association between SUA and IAs using Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. Methods: We conducted a two-sample MR analysis with SUA as the exposure variable and IAs as the outcome variable. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) datasets for SUA were acquired from the Open GWAS catalog, including 389,404 European and 129,405 East Asian individuals. The dataset for IAs was sourced from a meta-analysis of GWASs comprising 317,636 individuals across different ancestral populations (European: 7495 cases and 71,934 controls; East Asian: 3259 cases and 234,948 controls). The MR analyses were performed according to populations (European and East Asian) and IAs status [unruptured IAs (uIAs) or aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH)], respectively. The inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was employed as primary analysis to discern causal estimates. Results: Our findings revealed that an elevated genetically predicted SUA level (mg/dL) correlated with an increased risk of IAs among the European population (OR = 1.29 [95%CI:1.05-1.57], P = 0.013) and East Asian population (OR = 1.56 [95%CI: 1.27-1.92], P < 0.001). Among European individuals, subgroup analysis indicated a persistent causal association of SUA with uIAs (OR = 1.50 [95%CI: 1.08-2.08], P = 0.015) and aSAH (OR = 1.26 [95%CI: 1.00-1.60], P = 0.049). However, subgroup analysis in East Asian populations was not conducted due to the lack of separate data on uIAs and aSAH. Conclusions: Our MR analysis demonstrated a causal relationship between elevated SUA levels and an amplified risk of IAs. Further rigorous investigations are imperative to provide evidence and elucidate the underlying mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.