ArticleHeliyon2024
Assessment of cumulative incidences of mung bean crop production in lowlands of south Ethiopia through multiple factor analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distribution and Occurrence of Cercospora Leaf Spot of Mungbean (Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ethiopian farmers face a combination of risks in agricultural production during a single crop season. However, cumulative incidence assessment of the risks in the agriculture was not researched. Thus, this study aimed at assessing the cumulative incidence components in the production of the mung bean crop in the lowlands of South Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study was used with 384 mung bean farmers selected from lowlands of Gamo, Gofa and Wolaita zones. Thirteen original risk types were used to be categorized into a few factors through multiple factor analysis. Factor analysis identified latent variables with an Eigenvalues greater than one. The economic risk factor, the climate-related risk factor, and the systematic risk factor were the first three factors that explain 92.87 % of the inertia cumulatively. The rotated factor loading matrix indicated that under factor one, the encountered risks are an increase in the price of inputs, an increase in the price of food, and financial incidence, which accounted 50 % of the total variance. Under factor two extended dry spells, crop diseases, and wild animals' damage and livestock diseases and deaths variables that accounted for 23.24 % of the total variance. The risk types categorized under systematic risks were social risks and political risks that accounted for 19.61 % of the total variance of risks encountered by mung bean farmers in the study area. Therefore, disentangling systematic risks is important by providing much-needed information to mung bean farmers and policymakers regarding systematic risk management priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.