ArticleHeliyon2024
Full title- acceptability and feasibility of HIV self-testing (HIVST) among MSM and transgender women (
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring the feedback effects of incentive methods on HIV rapid self-testing among men who have sex with men in Chongqing, China.BMC public health · 2025Trial
- Stigma, privacy concerns, sexual behaviors, and testing history shape willingness to use HIV self-testing among African refugee men engaged in sex work in Italy - a mixed method study-BGSH-023.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Rising HIV infections and shifting transmission patterns in Bangladesh: Emerging risks among key populations.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- The Global Fund's Bangladesh program.IJID regions · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: HIV testing coverage among males having sex with males (MSM) and transgender women (locally known as Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 379 MSM and Results: Among 379 participants, the acceptability of HIVST was 99.5 % (n = 377). Reasons for acceptability included interest in independent testing (84.3 %), peer influence (57.3 %), quicker-easier procedure (54.9 %), and painless procedure (52.5 %). Qualitative findings revealed participant's risk perceptions, empowering feelings, social stigma, complementing working hours, and convenience during COVID-19 lockdowns. Around 92 % of the participants correctly completed HIVST. In multivariable analysis, the likelihood of correct test conduction was found higher among metropolitan, younger, married, educated, and participants who felt confident during HIVST process. Qualitative findings underscored the importance of supervising the use of HIVST for first-time users. Participants, particularly the less educated groups, highlighted the video demonstration as a useful tool in the context of difficulties in reading the textual instructions. However, most participants pointed out the result interpretation as the trickiest part of HIVST. All participants demonstrated willingness for future HIVST, were interested in social media-based approaches (84 %), were willing to purchase subsidized kits, and preferred conducting future tests alone at home (83.2 %). Conclusion: Oral fluid-based HIVST was an acceptable and feasible approach for MSM and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.