Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38818106›Full record

ArticleShoulder & elbow2024

Physiotherapy treatment for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: Results of a patient-centred rehabilitation guideline using functional and patient-reported outcome measures.

Jenna L Bardsley, Rachael Lc Daw, Jo Gibson, Peter Brownson, Inigo Guisasola, Matthew Kent, Rishee Parmar, Matthew G Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Shoulder & elbow, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Future advances in shoulder arthroplasty surgery.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jenna L BardsleyLiverpool Upper Limb Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6144-3759
Rachael Lc DawFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-0620
Jo GibsonLiverpool Upper Limb Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Peter BrownsonLiverpool Upper Limb Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Inigo GuisasolaLiverpool Upper Limb Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6869-7666
Matthew KentLiverpool Upper Limb Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Rishee ParmarLiverpool Upper Limb Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Matthew G SmithLiverpool Upper Limb Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Broadgreen Hospital, Liverpool University NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rehabilitation after primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is accepted to be an essential component to successful outcome achievement, but successful rehabilitation approaches have yet to be well described in the literature. This retrospective review documents the outcomes of a cohort of 29 patients undergoing RTSA surgery with rehabilitation following the Upper Limb Treatment and Rehabilitation Advice (ULTRA) guideline (Appendix 1). The Oxford Shoulder Score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score, range of movement (degrees of flexion, abduction and external rotation) and numerical rating score for pain were prospectively collected pre-operatively and at one- and two-years post-operatively. Scores were then evaluated to establish whether or not there were any significant changes over time. Statistically significant improvements were seen in all outcome domains from pre-operative to one-year post-operative. All improvements met the threshold for achieving substantial clinical benefit as well as exceeding the minimum clinically important difference, and all improvements were maintained at the two-year post-operative time point. The present study showed that following the ULTRA guideline after elective RTSA can give statistically significant improvements in range of movement, pain score and patient-reported outcome at one-year post-operatively, which can be maintained up to two-years post-operatively.

Indexed as

outcomerehabilitationreverse arthroplastyshoulder

Identifiers

PMID38818106
PMCPMC11135195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.