ArticleJACS Au2024
Au
Article in JACS Au, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photoluminescence of ligand-protected gold nanoclusters: progress in experimental and theoretical studies.Chemical science · 2026Review
- Phase Engineering of Nanogold: Non-Close Packed Square Planes in A'B' Stacking with a 0.5 Å Channel.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Atomically Precise Metal Nanoclusters for Bioimaging and Therapy: Progress and Perspectives.JACS Au · 2025Review
- AuJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2025Article
- Isomeric Effects of AuACS nano · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An Au
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.